The Energy of a Fire Truck in crash

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of a fire truck involved in a crash and how to effectively communicate the significance of that energy to fire department drivers. Participants explore various comparisons and analogies to convey the potential dangers associated with driving such heavy vehicles at high speeds, focusing on training and safety awareness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a fire truck crash scenario, providing details about the truck's speed and weight, and calculates its kinetic energy using the formula KE = 1/2 Mass X Velocity squared.
  • Another participant suggests using Wolfram Alpha to verify the kinetic energy calculation and provides a comparison to the energy required to power an iPhone for several months, questioning the impact of such comparisons on training effectiveness.
  • Some participants argue that comparisons should be made with vehicles that are more relatable to the drivers, such as a fully loaded semi-truck or a drag race car, to illustrate the kinetic energy in a more impactful way.
  • One participant shares a real-life incident involving a tour bus and an amphibious craft, suggesting that the outcomes of such accidents could serve as a more relevant training reference.
  • Another participant proposes using a hypothetical scenario involving a smaller car traveling at a high speed to engage drivers in understanding the energy involved, encouraging them to guess the speed required to achieve similar kinetic energy.
  • Several participants emphasize the need for drivers to recognize the dangers of speeding, particularly in a busy metropolitan area, and the importance of driving safely in emergency situations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best methods to convey the significance of kinetic energy in training. While some agree on the need for relatable comparisons, others challenge the effectiveness of certain analogies. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most impactful way to communicate these concepts to drivers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of comparing kinetic energy across different vehicles and scenarios, highlighting the importance of context in understanding the implications of speed and weight in emergency driving situations.

Who May Find This Useful

Fire department personnel, emergency responders, and individuals involved in driver training programs may find this discussion relevant for enhancing safety awareness and training methodologies.

gilljersey
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I am in need of some help. I work for a fire department who had a significant fire truck crash last summer. Because of this, my department has set about making a training program for our drivers. Lucky me, I am in charge of said program.

So I need some help.

Here is the story. Last summer one of our Ladder Trucks ( fire truck with the big long ladder on the top of the truck that extends out, not a fire engine that has water) was traveling around 58 mph on a curved road then is lost traction, slide and rolled. No one was seriously hurt.

Here is what we know. Said ladder truck was traveling around 58 MPH and weight 62,500 lbs. I know, using the formula for kinetic energy, ( KE= 1/2 Mass X Velocity squared) that this truck produced 7,016,409.78 ft lbs or 3,508 tons of energy.

What I am looking for is a way so show the members of my department what that much energy looks like. As in, that kind of power in an explosion, or a wrecking ball destroying a building. I need a way to relay to my guys, the power that they are driving down the roads and highways every day.

Luckily when this truck crash, it only hit a telephone pole a picket fence and a few cars. The extent of the damage was very little in comparison to what could have happened.

I have searched the web for a way to show this and have come up with nothing. Someone suggested I try a Science blog, so I leave it up to you. What have you got ?

And thanks for the help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Wolfram Alpha is a handy tool for this.

Chucking your numbers in,
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/2+*+62500lbs+*(58+mph)^2
we get about 9.5 megajoules. (the same as your number in ft lbs, though I don't know what you mean by "3508 tonnes of energy")

Which is about the amount of energy required to keep an iphone 5 going for 9 months...
Or about 200 g worth of gasoline.

So you know, not very much. I don't think comparing the dissipation of kinetic energy of the truck will make a very lasting impression on your drivers, sorry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Comparing disparate items is not a good picture in training. I would stay with something that is closer to the experience the people have. A fire truck is in an odd place as the rolling weight is heavier than many things but lighter than what is perceived as big. The truck that you are referencing could easily be compared to a tractor trailer. The Kinetic Energy in your truck would be roughly equivalent to a fully loaded Semi truck traveling at around 43ish mph. One could also compare it to a drag race car at close to 200 mph. The saving grace in the accident your evaluating is that the truck rolled ( dissipating energy), then it slid a distance ( further dissipation), and finally it took out some lesser objects to use the remaining energy. Lots of low impact stuff and a low damage would be the result.

I would suggest that a better picture would be something that fits in with emergency responder concepts of life. In Seattle Wa. on 9/24 there was a tour bus and a Duck (old military amphibious craft now used for tours) that got wrapped up on a bridge. 40,000 lb bus vs 38,000 lb Duck. Impact speed was approximately 45 mph, end result was 64 people involved. 4 dead, 12 critical, 30 other injured. Major triage event and we just think those mass casualty drills are off the hook.

Look at the numbers though. The forces are pretty close. The results easy to see. For you the Pictures are current and should be easy to find on the web. Most EVAP courses have some good other stuff for drivers to get a look at what can go wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: e.bar.goum
Ketch22 said:
Comparing disparate items is not a good picture in training. I would stay with something that is closer to the experience the people have. A fire truck is in an odd place as the rolling weight is heavier than many things but lighter than what is perceived as big. The truck that you are referencing could easily be compared to a tractor trailer. The Kinetic Energy in your truck would be roughly equivalent to a fully loaded Semi truck traveling at around 43ish mph. One could also compare it to a drag race car at close to 200 mph. The saving grace in the accident your evaluating is that the truck rolled ( dissipating energy), then it slid a distance ( further dissipation), and finally it took out some lesser objects to use the remaining energy. Lots of low impact stuff and a low damage would be the result.

I would suggest that a better picture would be something that fits in with emergency responder concepts of life. In Seattle Wa. on 9/24 there was a tour bus and a Duck (old military amphibious craft now used for tours) that got wrapped up on a bridge. 40,000 lb bus vs 38,000 lb Duck. Impact speed was approximately 45 mph, end result was 64 people involved. 4 dead, 12 critical, 30 other injured. Major triage event and we just think those mass casualty drills are off the hook.

Look at the numbers though. The forces are pretty close. The results easy to see. For you the Pictures are current and should be easy to find on the web. Most EVAP courses have some good other stuff for drivers to get a look at what can go wrong.
Thank you for your response. I do have all the other info on from EVOC / EVAP / EVDC or what ever your want to call it. I just need a something that will catch there attention. In all actuality, I need to guys to just slow down. The are in the DC Metro area. It is a common thing (common in the fact that everyone) to drive 15 mph over the posted speed limits at all times. Lots of traffic in this area. Lots of migrant people from all over the world. Everyone drives and differing speeds but most are over the limit. So is the case with the emergency services because we go for our POV to the seat of the Emergency vehicle with the same driving habits. Its a hard pill to swallow to tell some one who responds fast to an emergency that they are going fast. Thank you you all your information. I like the idea of using Seattle as a reference.
 
How about a 4,000 lb car? Going at 230 mph?

Get them to guess the speed required to achieve that energy before you tell them. I would bet they guess a lot lower.
 
gilljersey said:
Thank you for your response. I do have all the other info on from EVOC / EVAP / EVDC or what ever your want to call it. I just need a something that will catch there attention. In all actuality, I need to guys to just slow down. The are in the DC Metro area. It is a common thing (common in the fact that everyone) to drive 15 mph over the posted speed limits at all times. Lots of traffic in this area. Lots of migrant people from all over the world. Everyone drives and differing speeds but most are over the limit. So is the case with the emergency services because we go for our POV to the seat of the Emergency vehicle with the same driving habits. Its a hard pill to swallow to tell some one who responds fast to an emergency that they are going fast. Thank you you all your information. I like the idea of using Seattle as a reference.
One thing to drive home with your guys. The Seattle incident or even a you tube search of emergency response accidents will serve you well. In actuality they need to understand two things:

1) The old saying goes "One ahh Sh*t wipes out a thousand attaboys." Even the migrant drivers you are talking about are " good enough" They are not professional and they mostly get out of the way. Those of us in the emergency services are a big distraction. We are in fact the wild card that causes others to goof up. It is imperative for us starting at the driver (who should only be driving) to the right seat Capt or Engineer however your dept is configured ( right seat should deal with all the distractions) to drive not only for our vehicle but the others that do not know how to deal with the distraction that we bring along.

2) Unless a person is a full time driver of a rig it will not work like you are used to. Drive time for them is the only answer to being able to drive. The size, acceleration, deceleration, and turning are all different then you are used to. Don't push it

Appreciate your service.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K