The Expanding Universe: Why Stretching is the Only Explanation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of the expanding universe, specifically addressing the misconception that objects in the universe are shrinking rather than space itself stretching. The Doppler Effect is highlighted as a critical tool for detecting the movement of galaxies, supporting the theory of an expanding universe. Alternative theories like "tired light" have been dismissed due to their incorrect implications. Recent findings from NASA confirm that the acceleration of the universe's expansion has been observed since its early stages, solidifying the stretching model as the prevailing explanation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler Effect in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with the concept of light bending in relation to gravity
  • Basic knowledge of the expanding universe theory
  • Awareness of historical alternatives to the expansion model, such as "tired light"
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Doppler Effect and its applications in astronomy
  • Study the implications of light bending as described by general relativity
  • Explore NASA's findings on the acceleration of the universe's expansion
  • Investigate the historical context and criticisms of alternative theories to the expanding universe
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the evidence supporting it.

Tim.thelion
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I recently read in my "10th grade" physics textbook that the universes is constantly streaching making solarsystems farther apart, yet for some weird reason all objects still stay intact. This explanation included ireverence for such fundimental concepts as the cartisian coordinate system. I was wondering, is there any reason why space has to streach, could it not be true, instead, that everything was getting smaller, everything constantly falling in on itself? This would make the explanation make more sence, the only thing that my modle does not account for that I know of, is that my physics textbook used the streaching model to explain the bending of light.

Can someone with some knowledge of this tell me what an idiot I am and how I simply need to ignore the normal rules of reality in order to understand this level of physics?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Tim.thelion said:
I recently read in my "10th grade" physics textbook that the universes is constantly streaching making solarsystems farther apart, yet for some weird reason all objects still stay intact. This explanation included ireverence for such fundimental concepts as the cartisian coordinate system. I was wondering, is there any reason why space has to streach, could it not be true, instead, that everything was getting smaller, everything constantly falling in on itself? This would make the explanation make more sence, the only thing that my modle does not account for that I know of, is that my physics textbook used the streaching model to explain the bending of light.


Can someone with some knowledge of this tell me what an idiot I am and how I simply need to ignore the normal rules of reality in order to understand this level of physics?

No, your model wouldn't work. It isn't just that things are appearing smaller and we mistake that for moving away. The actual speed they are "moving away" is detectable with the Doppler Effect (google that), a shift of the light coming to us from the remote galaxies. Lots of people have tried to work out alternatives to the stretching, such as "tired light", but all these efforts have turned out to have wrong consequences, and the expanding universe, after 75 years of this, remains the last theory standing. Stretching is happening and is even acclerating! NASA just held a press conference yesterday to announce that work on the Hubble Space Telescope had now shown that the acceleration of the stretching has been going on since very early stages of the universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K