The Higgs Mass and the Many worlds interpretation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of the observed Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV in relation to the Many Worlds interpretation (MW) and the Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Multiverse predicts a Higgs mass of 140 GeV, while Supersymmetry predicts 115 GeV, highlighting a discrepancy with the observed value. Participants clarify that the Multiverse theory and Many Worlds interpretation are distinct concepts, and there is currently no refutation of quantum mechanics based on the Higgs mass. The conversation also references the documentary "Particle Fever" for additional insights into the Higgs discovery.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Higgs boson and its significance in particle physics
  • Knowledge of the Multiverse and Many Worlds interpretations
  • Basic grasp of Supersymmetry and its predictions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between the Many Worlds interpretation and the Multiverse interpretation
  • Explore the implications of the Higgs boson mass on current theories in particle physics
  • Watch the documentary "Particle Fever" for insights on the Higgs discovery
  • Study the predictions of Supersymmetry and their relevance to modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the implications of the Higgs boson mass on theoretical physics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

juzzy
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
I have a question about the Many worlds interpretation. Does the observed mass of the Higgs boson suggest that the many worlds interpretation is incorrect, as the mass falls smack in the middle of the predicted values of both supersymmetry and multiverse interpretations of the standard model of particle physics. I'm in no way surprised that reality threw this swerveball but am I misunderstanding the point here? Am I confusing multiverse with many-worlds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The predictions of the many-world's (also known as many universe's) interpretation is equivalent to standard Quantum Mechanics. I haven't seen any refutation of QM from the Higgs mass.
 
juzzy said:
I have a question about the Many worlds interpretation. Does the observed mass of the Higgs boson suggest that the many worlds interpretation is incorrect,

No.

There is no way to tell the difference between standard QM using just the formalism and MW. MW, like most interpretations, has deliberately been cooked up to be like that.

Thanks
Bill
 
StevieTNZ said:
The predictions of the many-world's (also known as many universe's) interpretation is equivalent to standard Quantum Mechanics. I haven't seen any refutation of QM from the Higgs mass.

No I haven't heard anything seriously refuting it either, however, the multiverse interpretation in particle physics (which I was assuming is just the same thing as Many-worlds in QM) predicts a Higgs Mass of 140 GeV. The Supersymmetry interpretation predicts 115 GeV. The observed value was 125 GeV.

I am just scratching my head now as are most proffessors I would imagine.
 
juzzy said:
however, the multiverse interpretation in particle physics (which I was assuming is just the same thing as Many-worlds in QM) predicts a Higgs Mass of 140 GeV. The Supersymmetry interpretation predicts 115 GeV. The observed value was 125 GeV.

They are different ie the Multiverse theory is different to MW. First I have heard of those different predictions.

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
They are different ie the Multiverse theory is different to MW. First I have heard of those different predictions.

Thanks
Bill

I was trying to remember where I heard it. It was a documentary which was about the Higgs discovery, I think it was called Particle fever. Good movie, gives a lot of insight. It may well be that I misunderstood or misheard. I should watch it again. I do recommend it though.
 
juzzy said:
I was trying to remember where I heard it. It was a documentary which was about the Higgs discovery, I think it was called Particle fever. Good movie, gives a lot of insight. It may well be that I misunderstood or misheard. I should watch it again. I do recommend it though.

My question was about many-worlds, though as you say Bill, they are not quite the same thing, so I guess it's not relevant.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 174 ·
6
Replies
174
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K