Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The Human Genome vs a person's genome

  1. Feb 6, 2014 #1

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    "The Human Genome" vs a person's genome

    Is "genome" a term that applies both to a species and to individuals of that species? What's the difference between "The Human Genome" and Eddie Ledesco's genome?

    For example, quoting from this article http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081105/full/456018a.html :

     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 6, 2014 #2

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The genome is the genetic material that is present within a cell. The human genome is what roughly represents us as a species, but of course there is individual variation. Some people have blond hair, others brown, that's because pigments are encoded slightly differently in their genomes. Here you can find the genome of Craig Venter http://huref.jcvi.org one of the people who drove the human genome project.

    A genome can even be different in a single human being, such individuals are called mosaic and we encounter them in clinical practice when a blood sample and a skin sample give discordant genetic information.
     
  4. Feb 7, 2014 #3

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Then what is meant when we see a news story that announces that the genome of a certain species has been "sequenced"? Does this only mean that a genome of a particular individual of that species has been sequenced?
     
  5. Feb 7, 2014 #4

    Pythagorean

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    My understanding is that the genes are the same, but that 'gene' is a more general description of the molecular string, and that the alleles are what vary (specific segments of the gene). So there is (mostly) only one human genome but individual humans have different alleles.

    I'm no expert in molecular biology, but this is my impression.
     
  6. Feb 7, 2014 #5

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It can mean both things, for humans it were individuals that were sequenced (which is of interest to correlate genotype with phenotypes). In a recent example the hookworm genome was sequenced, in that case worms were ground in liquid nitrogen and solubilized in buffer: http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/ng.2875.pdf The worms are probably inbred, so in that case one can take a population, because they don't vary much genetically anyway.

    I've worked with an isogenic (inbred) nematode strain that was sequenced by a consortium, later we found out that over generations our lab strain (a clone) had accumulated many mutations and that made it impossible to answer a certain research question: we had to sequence it again. It's impossible to say that there is "a genome for a species", one has to take variation and mutation in account.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Discussions: The Human Genome vs a person's genome
  1. Human Genome Project (Replies: 12)

  2. Human Genome help (Replies: 1)

  3. Human genome project (Replies: 3)

  4. Human Genome Project . (Replies: 3)

Loading...