The Hunt for Red October: Jonesy, The SONAR Man

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the plot of the movie "The Hunt for Red October," specifically focusing on the character Jonesy, the SONAR man, and the plausibility of the submarine's stealth capabilities. Participants explore themes of detection, character intelligence, and narrative consistency within the context of military technology and realism.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a low-level US SONAR man could detect and track the Red October if it was such a significant threat, suggesting a plot inconsistency.
  • Another participant humorously references unrelated topics, indicating a shift in focus from the original question.
  • Some participants discuss the character of Jonesy, noting that in the books he is portrayed as a genius who later attends MIT, which raises questions about intelligence and background in military roles.
  • There are anecdotes shared about individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds succeeding in the Navy, with some participants emphasizing the intelligence required to be a submariner.
  • One participant argues that if the submarine could be detected, it undermines its portrayal as a real threat, suggesting a failure in the plot's logic.
  • In response, another participant defends the plausibility of the scenario, explaining that the submarine was initially tracked using conventional propulsion before switching to the magnetohydrodynamic drive, allowing for subsequent analysis of its noise.
  • Several posts reiterate the idea that the narrative's tension relies on the submarine's supposed stealth, while questioning the effectiveness of that portrayal based on the SONAR detection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the plausibility of the plot and the character's intelligence. While some agree on the inconsistency of the submarine's stealth, others defend the narrative's logic, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various aspects of military life and intelligence, but there are no clear conclusions drawn regarding the effectiveness of the submarine's stealth technology or the character development of Jonesy.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
Does anyone else like to pick apart the plot in books and movies? I do.

One movie that they have been running almost endlessly on cable is The Hunt for Red October, which is a favorite of mine. But one thing in the plot that really grabbed my attention was the bit about Jonesy, the SONAR man.

Here we have a first strike weapon - the Soviet submarine Red October - propelled by a magnetohydrodynamic drive, that will almost certainly ignite WWIII because of its stealthy silence. It can't be detected by US subs. So in the interest of world peace, the good Captain Marko Ramius, of the Soviet Union, betrays his nation, throws away his career, and with his secret weapon, defects to the US and saves the world by restoring the balance of power.

If this sub was such a great threat to world peace, then how is it that during its maiden voyage, a low level US SONAR man is able to not only detect the sub, but also track it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think he was into cetacean porn.
 
Maybe for the same reason that a (Lithuanian?, Romanian?... I forget) sailor had a Scots accent.
 
Or how about that new Oliver Stone movie http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1175491/videogallery" ... I mean, as if a guy like that could seriously get elected to become the President of the United States!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two missiles with nuclear warheads are fired in opposite directions. Superman travels slightly faster than one of the missiles and after much huffing and puffing, finally catches up to it. As a result, he doesn't have enough time to catch the other missile which explodes killing someone close to him. So he travels faster than light to turn back the clock.
 
jimmysnyder said:
Two missiles with nuclear warheads are fired in opposite directions. Superman travels slightly faster than one of the missiles and after much huffing and puffing, finally catches up to it. As a result, he doesn't have enough time to catch the other missile which explodes killing someone close to him. So he travels faster than light to turn back the clock.

This could theoretically be explained through dramatic effect, that due to his grief over the loss of his loved one he pushed himself harder than ever before. Consider the person who lifts a truck off of their loved one due to adrenaline rush.

I agree though, it was pretty cheesy.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
If this sub was such a great threat to world peace, then how is it that during its maiden voyage, a low level US SONAR man is able to not only detect the sub, but also track it?
I don't remember the exact subplot, but in the books Jonesey is a genius who goes to MIT after leaving the navy.

Relating it to reality: he's black and a junior enlisted man who turns out to be brilliant. It happens. You can't be a submariner without displaying at least some intelligence and many inner-city blacks use the Navy as a way to escape. The navigator on my ship was a skinny little black kid from East St. Louis who because of his size had to find an alternate means of defending himself. He lit people on fire. He was pushed to join the Navy as a way to get out (his school administrators recognized his intelligence, but he had no hope of making it into college on his own). He enlisted, eventually got OCS, the navy paid for college, and now he's on a track for command. And he married a hot lawyer.
 
russ_watters said:
I don't remember the exact subplot, but in the books Jonesey is a genius who goes to MIT after leaving the navy.

Relating it to reality: he's black and a junior enlisted man who turns out to be brilliant. It happens. You can't be a submariner without displaying at least some intelligence and many inner-city blacks use the Navy as a way to escape. The navigator on my ship was a skinny little black kid from East St. Louis who because of his size had to find an alternate means of defending himself. He lit people on fire. He was pushed to join the Navy as a way to get out (his school administrators recognized his intelligence, but he had no hope of making it into college on his own). He enlisted, eventually got OCS, the navy paid for college, and now he's on a track for command. And he married a hot lawyer.

she wasn't a hot lawyer before he met her though?

Just a word of advice, don't describe the wife of someone who sets people on fire as hot.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
I don't remember the exact subplot, but in the books Jonesey is a genius who goes to MIT after leaving the navy.
That kind of reminds me of those two geniuses that graduated from MIT, then became auto mechanics. Then they got their own radio show! A comedy show where they give out real auto repair advice! Life is sometimes stranger than fiction.

Relating it to reality: he's black and a junior enlisted man who turns out to be brilliant. It happens. You can't be a submariner without displaying at least some intelligence and many inner-city blacks use the Navy as a way to escape. The navigator on my ship was a skinny little black kid from East St. Louis who because of his size had to find an alternate means of defending himself. He lit people on fire. He was pushed to join the Navy as a way to get out (his school administrators recognized his intelligence, but he had no hope of making it into college on his own). He enlisted, eventually got OCS, the navy paid for college, and now he's on a track for command. And he married a hot lawyer.

Not only does it happen, but it happens more than one would think. I was always amazed by how many enlisted I knew that scored in the top 10% on their ASVAB scores - at least until I thought about it - the higher scores almost always wind up concentrated in a few select career fields and we had about 3 of those career fields in most of the places I worked.
 
  • #10
If the first guy to encounter this weapon is able to detect and track it, obviously the sub was never a real threat in the first place.

Verdict: Plot Failed!
 
  • #11
Ivan Seeking said:
If the first guy to encounter this weapon is able to detect and track it, obviously the sub was never a real threat in the first place.

Verdict: Plot Failed!

Ivan that should be: FAIL Plot is FAIL
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
If the first guy to encounter this weapon is able to detect and track it, obviously the sub was never a real threat in the first place.

Verdict: Plot Failed!

Nope, watch it again. It is a plausible scenario. The Red October was using conventional propulsion and being tracked by by the US sub when it cut over to the MHD drive. So the subsequent sounds from that same bearing could be analyzed in detail to look for anything unusual that could then be interpreted as the new drive noise. If they hadn't been tracking it and locked onto its bearing in the first place, then that subsequent analysis would not have been possible.

Hey, we're talking Clancy here. His plots are tight.
 
  • #13
jimmysnyder said:
Two missiles with nuclear warheads are fired in opposite directions. Superman travels slightly faster than one of the missiles and after much huffing and puffing, finally catches up to it. As a result, he doesn't have enough time to catch the other missile which explodes killing someone close to him. So he travels faster than light to turn back the clock.

What's more, if Superman is such a great guy, then why didn't he ever go back and visit his poor mother?
 
  • #14
berkeman said:
Nope, watch it again. It is a plausible scenario. The Red October was using conventional propulsion and being tracked by by the US sub when it cut over to the MHD drive. So the subsequent sounds from that same bearing could be analyzed in detail to look for anything unusual that could then be interpreted as the new drive noise. If they hadn't been tracking it and locked onto its bearing in the first place, then that subsequent analysis would not have been possible.

Hey, we're talking Clancy here. His plots are tight.

Cleary the device produced a unique sound. The threat portrayed was that the sub was silent and undetectable. But it wasn't silent, it was just more difficult to detect.

Given the same challenge, I'm sure that PFers could have deduced a method of detection. :biggrin:
 
  • #15
It did have a bit of a loose end with the silent drive. Since I got accepted in the SECF (Submarine Electronics Computer Field) I've been studying up on submarine sonar and communication systems (at least what's available to the public). The Hunt for Red October is also one of my favorite movies, so I also looked into the reality of a magnetohydrodynamic drive.

What I found is that the 'silent drive' really isn't all that silent anyway. The situation you have is that the propulsion system requires quite a bit of power to function... which would drain the batteries in a typical diesel sub relatively quickly. That in it's self wouldn't allow for very long stealthy trips before you would have to surface again to turn on the diesel engine and recharge the batteries.

The next logical step would be to skip a diesel powered sub and have it powered by a nuclear reactor. Well, that in it's self has a drawback as nuclear subs aren't nearly as silent as their diesel counterparts, and large subs such as a Typhoon class sub, are inherently nuclear because of their large size. The nuclear reactors are cooled by pumps which generate a bit of noise, along with the noisy turbine machinery.

So, what your left with is a propulsion system which is pretty much useless because to be able to power it while also maintaining ultimate stealthiness, you have to have a nuclear reactor which generates greater noise than a diesel-battery setup.
 
  • #16
And then there's this...

The film adaptation of The Hunt for Red October popularized the magnetohydrodynamic drive as a caterpillar drive for submarines, an undetectable "silent drive" intended to achieve stealth in submarine warfare. In reality, the current traveling through the water would create gases and noise, and the magnetic fields would induce a detectable magnetic signature. In the novel, of which the movie was an adaptation, the caterpillar was a pumpjet.

The major problem with MHD is that with current technologies it is more expensive and much slower than a propeller driven by an engine. The extra expense is from the large generator that must be driven by an engine. Such a large generator is not required when an engine directly drives a propeller.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamic_drive

What use would a 'silent drive' be if you could only operate it on the surface?

Clancy pretty much took a bit of technology that does truly exist, only he left out some of the specifics so that he could make a good story.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K