The line between quantum and large scale objects

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bassplayer142
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Quantum Scale
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between quantum mechanics and classical physics, particularly regarding the interpretation of probability and causality. It highlights the challenge of reconciling quantum theory with relativity, often referred to as the "theory of everything." The law of large numbers is emphasized, illustrating how probabilistic events can be predicted with high confidence when scaled to large quantities, such as flipping a vast number of coins. The conversation suggests that a deeper understanding of statistical mechanics is essential for bridging the gap between these two realms of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Classical physics principles
  • Statistical mechanics concepts
  • Understanding of the law of large numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore quantum mechanics and its probabilistic nature
  • Study classical physics and its deterministic framework
  • Investigate statistical mechanics and its applications
  • Research current theories attempting to unify quantum mechanics and relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum mechanics and classical physics, particularly those exploring the intersection of these theories.

bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Where is the line between these two subjects. I understand that I may be asking an unanswerable and highly studied question. I understand that in the quantum world everything is based on probability. But when looking at things at our perspective we never see this probability. Everything is based on cause and effect. Why doesn't some of our equations take into effect these small probabilities no matter how minute they may be? Is this really what it means to connect quantum theory and relativity as the theory of everything? I supposed I just don't understand what the barrier between the two theories are.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you flip 10 coins, you would not be surprised to see 60% of them turn up heads by chance. If you flip 6.02x1023 coins, you would be very surprised to see 60% of them turn up as heads by chance.

In other words, by the law of large numbers, probabalistic events can be predicted through statistics with high confidence. A lot of these concepts would be covered in a statistical mechanics course of textbook.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
531
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
22K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K