Undergrad The logical impossibility of proving that indeterminism is true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tade
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the debate over whether the universe is deterministic or indeterministic, with the assertion that proving indeterminism is logically impossible. It posits that no experimental results can conclusively demonstrate indeterminism, suggesting that while the universe may be indeterministic, this cannot be proven. The conversation is framed as philosophical rather than scientific, highlighting the limitations of physics in proving such concepts. Participants express frustration over the lack of resolution in these discussions, emphasizing that they are better suited for philosophical forums. Ultimately, the topic raises significant questions about the nature of reality and the boundaries of scientific inquiry.
tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
One interesting question is whether our universe, our reality, is deterministic, or indeterministic.

And there's the idea that being able to prove that our universe, the physics, is indeterministic, is logically impossible. So, it includes whatever experimental ideas and results that one can possibly conceive and imagine, and the end result would still be that it is logically impossible to prove.

So the universe could be truly indeterministic, but we'll never able to prove it. And better not mistake this for poetic metaphysical imaginings, as this is hard logic.

So what do you think about this idea on whether its correct or not
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is impossible to prove something in physics. Descriptive sciences can only falsify.

This question is philosophical, meta-physics at best, which we do not discuss at PF. It never reaches a satisfactory end for all participants, and most of all, does not allow a criterion on when a discussion has actually ended.

I'm sorry, and as much as I would personally like to discuss such topics, we leave it to websites for philosophy.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Bystander
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K