High School The Mystery of Excited Electrons: Are They Moving Away from the Nucleus?

Click For Summary
Excited electrons in the conduction band are generally considered to be further from the nucleus than valence electrons, as higher-energy electrons tend to occupy higher energy states. However, due to the principles of quantum mechanics, electrons cannot be precisely located, and even high-energy electrons can have a probability of being found near the nucleus. In the conduction band, electrons are not bound to specific atoms, allowing them to move freely over long distances. The discussion highlights that if electrons were strongly localized to a nucleus, electrical conduction would not occur. The nature of the band structure is more about energy states than spatial positioning.
Mustafa Bayram
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
when an electron is excited to the conduction band is it move further from the nucleus?
Are free electrons in the conduction band further from valence electrons?
I saw this picture that seems problematic to me. what do you think?

conduction band.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what that picture represents, but (1) it looks like a very classical-minded picture and (2) the band structure is a feature in energy, not in space.

Generally speaking, higher-energy electrons are farther away from the nucleus, and therefore further away from core electrons. But the proper description is quantum mechanical, so you can't assign a precise position to an electron. Even high-energy electrons have a non-zero probability of being found near the nucleus.

In the conduction band, electrons are no longer tethered to a particular atom and are free to move over long distances.
 
DrClaude said:
I am not sure what that picture represents
Me neither, but for some reason I remember that I need to pick up some thing at Target.
DrClaude said:
In the conduction band, electrons are no longer tethered to a particular atom
This is key. Can you write it again?

If all the electrons were strongly localized to a nucleus, you wouldn't have conduction!
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
482