I The number of intersection graphs of ##n## convex sets in the plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the number of intersection graphs formed by n convex sets in the plane, specifically showing that this number is at least 2^{Ω(n^2)}. Participants explore the relationship between intersection graphs of simple curves and convex sets, suggesting that proving the lower bound for curves may involve constructing various configurations. One example provided involves parallel lines with detours crossing other curves, illustrating how independent choices can lead to different intersection graphs. However, this example is deemed insufficient for reaching the desired lower bound, prompting a search for more robust methods. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of proving the intersection graph count and the need for innovative approaches.
kmitza
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
My friend gave me a problem that's been given in her combinatorial geometry class, I have been struggling with finding any ideas on how to do it. I don't have many tools from this topic and I might not understand any hints/solutions but I would still like to see if people have any ideas
Let ##S## be a set of n geometric objects in the plane. The intersection graph of ##S## is a
graph on ##n## vertices that correspond to the objects in ##S##. Two vertices are connected
by an edge if and only if the corresponding objects intersect.

Show that the number of intersection graphs of ##n## simple curves in the plane is at least ##2^{\Omega(n^2)}##.

I thought that this would be easy to see, online I found out that this is equivalent to finding this number is equivalent to finding the number for convex sets. This doesn't change the nature of the problem though and I think this shouldn't be too hard to prove but I can't figure it out. Any hints and ideas on how to think about this would be appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of simple curve here? I'm not sure why you think convex sets are involved.
 
You might be able to show how to construct curves in enough different ways to reach that limit.

Imagine a set of N parallel lines parallel to the x axis. At x=1, line 1 at the lowest y value makes a "detour" crossing 0...n-1 other curves above it. At x=2, line 2 makes a detour crossing 0...n-2 other curves above it. And so on. For each line the choice is independent and each choice leads to a different intersection graph, so we get (n-1)! different intersection graphs. That's not enough, you'll need a better approach, but it's an example how you can show a lower bound.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top