The Physics Behind a Bullet Hitting The Human Body

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a bullet impacting the human body, specifically addressing misconceptions about the effects of such an impact as portrayed in movies. The subject area includes concepts of momentum, inelastic collisions, and the forces involved in such scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of momentum conservation in a perfectly inelastic collision scenario, questioning the necessary parameters and values needed for calculations. There is discussion about the forces involved and the lack of specific data for a hypothetical situation.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the conservation of momentum and discussing the implications of recoil and the physiological responses of individuals when impacted. There is no clear consensus, but various interpretations and experiences are being shared to deepen understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific values for force and duration of impact, as the scenario is based on a fictional context rather than a controlled experiment. This limitation affects the ability to derive concrete conclusions from the discussion.

MG5
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Ok so I'm trying to show how a bullet in real life will not actually make a person fly backwards like it does in movies. I have some idea of how to go about this but need help.

So far...

I know it's a perfectly inelastic collision since the bullet sticks into the person so would I have to use this? m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1+m2) v2f

Or would I only be using momentum and/or force?

Bullet
m=.008kg
v= 430 m/s

Person

m=84kg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MG5 said:
I know it's a perfectly inelastic collision since the bullet sticks into the person so would I have to use this? m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1+m2) v2f

Yes, you do have momentum conservation.

Or would I only be using momentum and/or force?

Sorry, what do you mean? The momentum is certainly imparted to the shot person through a force, but you don't know either the magnitude of the force or the duration of time it acts on the person, do you?
 
Hypersphere said:
Yes, you do have momentum conservation.



Sorry, what do you mean? The momentum is certainly imparted to the shot person through a force, but you don't know either the magnitude of the force or the duration of time it acts on the person, do you?

No I don't know either of those values. Since I'm choosing a scene from a movie where this type of thing would happen, I'm not given any values. I just have to estimate the givens such as mass, velocity of bullet, mass of person and stuff like that and solve for everything else.
 
The momentum imparted to the victim will be less than that imparted to the shooter by the recoil of the gun. Did that knock him down?

I saw a training vidio once where they shot a guy wearing heavy body armor in the chest with several different high powered rifles, and a 12 ga deer slug. All this while he balanced on one foot. He just stood there and was not even close to falling down.

I've talked with several snipers, and with people who were standing next to people hit by a sniper, and I've read the witness accounts. A heart shot causes them to drop like someone turned off a switch. A brain shot causes them to thrash around randomly for a little while. Any motion by the victim after being shot other than simply dropping is biological or neurological in nature.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K