The psychology of labelling others as crackpots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meatbot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Psychology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the tendency of scientists to label unconventional thinkers as "crackpots," often dismissing their ideas without thorough consideration. Participants argue that this behavior stifles innovation and discourages legitimate theorizing. They emphasize the importance of applying reasonable criteria to evaluate unconventional ideas rather than resorting to knee-jerk labeling. The conversation highlights the psychological motivations behind such dismissals and advocates for a more constructive approach to discussing unconventional theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scientific skepticism and its role in theory evaluation
  • Familiarity with the concept of "crackpot" theories in scientific discourse
  • Knowledge of peer review processes and their significance in academia
  • Awareness of the psychological factors influencing scientific communication
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the criteria for evaluating unconventional scientific theories
  • Explore the impact of labeling on scientific discourse and innovation
  • Investigate case studies of dismissed theories that later gained acceptance
  • Learn about the psychology of scientific communication and peer interactions
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, researchers, and educators interested in fostering open dialogue about unconventional ideas and improving the evaluation process of new theories in scientific communities.

  • #31
dst said:
Interesting - this?
http://forums.myspace.com/t/3630410.aspx?fuseaction=forums.viewthread&PageIndex=3&SortOrder=0



:smile:
Hey! That's my boy! :biggrin: He starts off sounding sane enough, but then as you start to dig a little deeper ... :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
OmCheeto said:
Ignorons? hmmmm...
Oh, this really is shooting fish in a barrel, but this guy really is priceless. Here's private message I was privileged enough to receive:

Read Dr.Ameen's Ignorons Quantum Field Theory to understand your confusion of what are neutrinos oscillation.Remember photon masslessness is due to induced levitation effects as Dr.Ameen's disovery

http://www.myspace.com/syedameen

P.S:
my replies are facing some dirty hacker who is not posting my responses and replies,although my name and photo appears but message is gobbled.Perhaps this is deliberate as I had been a dissident U.S. scientist whom Intelligence agents want to discredit and not let to be exposed?!It is a shame but that what happening evry time
If you go to his profile page you can read about his "PHYSICS OF IGNORONS , SCIENTIFICATION THEORY & APPLICATIONS"

I once posted a reply to one of his where I claimed, with great excitement, to have discovered that his theory of ignorons was equivalent to my own theory, based on fundamental particles I called "morons". Turns out they're just different states of the same underlying "simpleton" particle! I went on to discuss such things as the spontaneous production of massive hardons and so forth, and you know what reponse I got? Not a peep! No one even blinked! Gotta love MySpace!
 
  • #33
you should email him again----(maybe the email got lost in leviton space)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
12K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K