The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Christof Koch's book, "The Quest for Consciousness," which explores the neuronal correlates of consciousness (NCC) and the biological basis of subjective experience. Koch and Francis Crick's framework aims to address the mind-body problem through empirical research, although critics argue that it does not resolve the "hard problem" of consciousness. Participants debate the validity of mechanistic explanations versus philosophical interpretations, emphasizing the limitations of current scientific understanding and the need for a more nuanced approach to consciousness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neuronal correlates of consciousness (NCC)
  • Familiarity with the mind-body problem in philosophy
  • Knowledge of empirical research methods in neuroscience
  • Awareness of the physicalist-nonphysicalist debate
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of neuronal correlates of consciousness (NCC) in neuroscience
  • Study the mind-body problem and its historical context in philosophy
  • Explore empirical research techniques used in consciousness studies
  • Investigate the physicalist versus nonphysicalist perspectives on consciousness
USEFUL FOR

Neuroscientists, philosophers of mind, cognitive scientists, and anyone interested in the empirical study of consciousness and its underlying mechanisms.

  • #61
A conscious moment

I've been reading John Searle's "Consciousness"

He proposes the "Unified Field Theory" suggesting that consciousness is spread across a portion of the brain called the thalamocortical system. Searle states, "we should look for consciousness as a feature of the brain emerging from the activities of large masses of neurons, and which cannot be explained by the activities of individual neurons".

In my humble opinion, that statement hints of "Emergence". Allow me to offer a slightly changed version of an analogy I stated earlier:

Imagine all the ways thousands of butterflies trapped in a 3-D matrix could flap their wings in synchronicity. Not just all at once but in a symphony of "flowing" patterns (a large 3-D matrix). Imagine in it's past, a breeze passed through the matrix. The pattern of beating wings shifted in response to the force of the breeze propagating through the matrix. Now the wings, in the absence of a breeze, shift back to that pattern as the matrix experiences a conscious moment.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #62
loseyourname said:
To elaborate on what salty said, imagine that we can reconstruct your own brain, neuron by neuron, to the point where the architecture and functionality of the second brain was exactly the same as yours. Would it not believe it was you? It would have your memories filed away and your behavioral tendencies programmed into it (including any tendency to love in a particular way). It would also hold all of the same beliefs that you do. Now imagine we did this same thing, but instead of using organic neurons, we used silicon chips that performed exactly the same computations and behaved exactly like human neurons. Wouldn't the outcome be the same? We'd have created a robot Mentat, complete with your past and your social constructs. (You'll have to put aside the practical impossibility of ever doing this, of course.)

Quite correct (and admirably succinct).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K