The risk of a superconducting cable exploding

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
jeffinbath
Gold Member
Messages
39
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
If the goal of achieving a room temperature superconducting cable were to fully succeed , would there not always be an explosion risk?
In a future supposed “room temperature” superconducting cable that is carrying a large current (I ), would there not always be a risk of explosion if part of the cable accidentally reached a higher critical temperature so that this part suddenly developed a resistance (R) and all the power would heat the cable following the I2 R law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the case for all superconducting cables, not just room temperature superconductors. Superconducting cables, using both low temperature superconductors like Nb-Ti and high temperature copper oxide based superconductors are a reality today. For the reasons you stated, these always have a copper conductor in parallel with the superconductor to carry the current if the superconductor gets "quenched". You can see that in this diagram of a HTSC cable.

Screenshot 2025-01-20 at 2.04.41 PM.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: crashcat, jeffinbath and berkeman