The sum of two gamma distributions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the summation of two gamma-distributed random variables, specifically exploring whether the sum of two independent gamma distributions results in another gamma distribution. Participants are examining the use of moment generating functions (MGFs) to prove this property.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if X ~ gamma(x, λ) and Y ~ gamma(y, λ), then Z = X + Y is gamma(x+y, λ).
  • There is a suggestion that using moment generating functions is a method to prove this relationship.
  • One participant notes the relationship between the MGFs of X and Y, stating that MZ(t) = MX(t) * MY(t) under the assumption of independence.
  • Another participant elaborates on the calculation of the MGFs, indicating that they can derive MZ(t) from the product of MX(t) and MY(t).
  • It is mentioned that the independence of X and Y allows for the simplification of the expectation E[e^(tZ)] into the product of expectations E[e^(tX)] and E[e^(tY)].
  • One participant confirms the derivation of the MGFs and concludes that this leads to the result Z ~ gamma(x+y, λ), contingent on the independence assumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of using moment generating functions to demonstrate the property of the sum of gamma distributions, but the discussion does not explicitly resolve whether this is the only method or if there are alternative approaches.

Contextual Notes

The discussion assumes the independence of the random variables X and Y, which is critical for the application of the moment generating functions. There is no exploration of alternative proofs or methods outside of MGFs.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in probability theory, specifically those studying properties of gamma distributions and moment generating functions, may find this discussion relevant.

Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
let X~gamma(x,λ), Y~gamma(y,λ)
then Z = X+Y is gamma (x+y, λ)

I'm trying to prove this. Is using the moment generating functions the only way to do it.

and in such case, can I assume that MZ(t)= MX(t)*MY(t)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bachelier said:
let X~gamma(x,λ), Y~gamma(y,λ)
then Z = X+Y is gamma (x+y, λ)

I'm trying to prove this. Is using the moment generating functions the only way to do it.

and in such case, can I assume that MZ(t)= MX(t)*MY(t)

Hint: Do you know what Moment Generating Functions are? Do you know the consequence of equating a MGF to a particular distribution?
 
I know MX(t) = ∫X E[et*x] dx

and MY(t) = ∫X E[et*y] dy

hence I get MZ(t) = ∫X E[et*x] dx * ∫YE[et*y] dy
 
Bachelier said:
I know MX(t) = ∫X E[et*x] dx

and MY(t) = ∫X E[et*y] dy

hence I get MZ(t) = ∫X E[et*x] dx * ∫YE[et*y] dy

Let Z = X + Y and calculate E[e^(tZ)]. Also you can use the fact that since X and Y are independent then E[e^(tZ)] = E[e^(t[X+Y])] = E[e^(tX + tY)] = E[e^(tX)] x E[e^(tY)].
 
I know how to get to

MX(t) = (λ/ λ-t)x

and MY(t) = (λ/ λ-t)y

hence since MZ(t) = MX(t)*MY(t)

this implies MZ(t) = (λ/ λ-t)x+y

which implies Z~gamma(x+y, λ)
 
Bachelier said:
I know how to get to

MX(t) = (λ/ λ-t)x

and MY(t) = (λ/ λ-t)y

hence since MZ(t) = MX(t)*MY(t)

this implies MZ(t) = (λ/ λ-t)x+y

which implies Z~gamma(x+y, λ)

Yep that's it. As long as you have the assumption that X and Y are independent, you have your result which is correct.
 
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K