The surprisingly simple linear potential solution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pellman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Potential
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the linear potential in quantum mechanics, specifically the solutions to the Schrödinger equation involving a linear potential term. Participants explore the mathematical formulation, potential solutions, and implications of these solutions in both momentum and position space.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a discussion with an instructor about the complexity of the linear potential and its treatment using Airy functions.
  • Another participant questions the normalization constant for the proposed wave function.
  • A participant presents a solution in momentum space and discusses its transformation to position space, noting that it results in an Airy function.
  • There is a mention of the solution being a superposition of energy eigenstates with equal probability, which some participants argue may not be particularly useful.
  • One participant suggests that viewing the solution as an accelerating plane wave could be beneficial in contexts where momentum eigenstates are more relevant than energy eigenstates.
  • Several participants agree that the solution can be expressed in terms of Airy functions, but they also note that the original expression is simpler.
  • Concerns are raised about the normalization of the proposed solution, with one participant arguing that normalization depends on time, which could conflict with the requirements of the Schrödinger equation.
  • Another participant defends the proposed solution's normalization, asserting that it remains valid despite the time dependence of the eigenvalue.
  • A later reply acknowledges a mistake in the previous argument regarding normalization, indicating a correction in understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the usefulness of the linear potential solution and its normalization. While some agree on the mathematical formulation, there is no consensus on the implications or practical applications of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include unresolved issues regarding the normalization of the wave function and its implications for the Schrödinger equation. The dependence of the eigenvalue on time is also a point of contention.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Once upon a time I was taking a quantum class and I asked the instructor why we did not cover the linear potential. What happened to F=ma in quantum mechanics? He said it was quite non-trivial and had to be done with Airy functions; not suitable for an introductory class.

Ok.

Given the Schrödinger equation

[tex]\{ -\frac{1}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}-Fx\}\Psi=i \frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}[/tex]

how about

[tex]\Psi\propto exp\{i[(k+Ft)x-\frac{k^2 t}{2m}-\frac{kFt^2}{2m}-\frac{F^2t^3}{6m}]\}[/tex]

where k is arbitrary?

Why isn't this well known? I spent some time digging through quantum texts in a science library and found only the barest mention of it, just a quick reference in a chapter exercise.

Seems like since it is so very simple it should get mentioned. I presume that it is because it is uninteresting. But why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what is the normalization constant?
 
The linear potential is easy to solve in momentum space, where the time-indepdent Schrödinger equation is (with [itex]\hbar=1[/itex])

[tex]{p^2\over 2m}\widetilde\psi_E(p) - iF{d\over dp}\widetilde\psi_E(p) = E\widetilde\psi_E(p)[/tex]

The (unnormalizable) solution is

[tex]\widetilde\psi_E(p) = \exp\!\left[{i\over F}\left(Ep-{p^3\over 6m\right)\right][/tex]

To get to position space, we have to Fourier transform from [itex]p[/itex] to [itex]x[/itex], and this yields an Airy function.

However, the general solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (in momentum space) is given by

[tex]\widetilde\psi(p,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dE\;c(E)\,e^{-iEt}\;\widetilde\psi_E(p)[/tex]

where the coefficient [itex]c(E)[/itex] is an arbitary function of [itex]E[/itex]. If we choose [itex]c(E)=\exp(-ikE/F)[/itex], where [itex]k[/itex] is arbitrary, we get

[tex]\widetilde\psi(p,t)\propto \delta(p-k-Ft)\exp(-ip^3/6mF)[/tex]

The time-dependent wave function in position space is then

[tex]\psi(x,t) = {1\over\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dp\;e^{ipx}\;\widetilde\psi(p,t)[/tex]

which works out to be

[tex]\psi(x,t) \propto\exp[i(k+Ft)x-i(k+Ft)^3/6mF][/tex]

This is your solution with an extra constant phase factor of [itex]\exp(-ik^3/6mF)[/itex]. It is nice that it can be expressed exactly, but physically it corresponds to a superposition of energy eigenstates with equal probability for every energy (and a particular energy-dependent phase factor). This is not a particularly useful wave function to know.
 
CPL.Luke said:
what is the normalization constant?

In 1-D, a normalization constant of [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}[/tex] gives [tex]\langle\Psi_k|\Psi_{k'}\rangle=\delta(k-k')[/tex] same as for free momentum states. Notice that this solution reduces to the plane wave for F=0.
 
Last edited:
Avodyne said:
It is nice that it can be expressed exactly, but physically it corresponds to a superposition of energy eigenstates with equal probability for every energy (and a particular energy-dependent phase factor). This is not a particularly useful wave function to know.

I expect you're right. I myself have no sense of what is useful or not.

However, you can also look at this solution as an accelerating plane wave. At any particular time t its shape is a pure plane wave corresponding to momentum k+Ft, that is, a plane wave whose wavelength shortens with time. So if you are dealing with a system in which momentum eigenstates are more important than energy eigenstates, wouldn't you prefer this solution?
 
The solution for the linear potential is an Airy function. The details are found in many tests on solid state optics.
 
Dr Transport said:
The solution for the linear potential is an Airy function. The details are found in many tests on solid state optics.

Yes, that is true. The solutions in terms of Airy functions are the energy eigenstates.

The expression in the OP is also an exact solution ... but one that is much simpler.
 
I'm sorry pellman I was trying to point out that your solution has a problem with normalisation.

for one the nomalization depends on time, which means that a normalised solution would no longer be a solution to the Schrödinger equation.


although your response puzzles me, are you trying to solve the eigenvalue problem for the linear potential (which are the airy functions) or are you trying to write the full solution. if its the latter that would mean your solution satisfies <Y||Y>=1
 
Check again. Unless I'm mistaken, if

[tex]\Psi_k(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} exp{\{i[(k+Ft)x-\frac{k^2 t}{2m}-\frac{kFt^2}{2m}-\frac{F^2t^3}{6m}]\}}[/tex]

then

[tex]\int{\Psi_{k'}^*(x,t)\Psi_k(x,t)dx}=\delta(k-k')[/tex]

The solution is an eigenstate of momentum. The eigenvalue k+Ft depends on time, true, but since time is a parameter here and not a dynamical variable, I don't think that is a problem.
 
  • #10
my mistake, you are correct
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K