I The uniqueness of D=4

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
TL;DR Summary
Discussions about having 3 spacial dimensions
I have found an interesting rabbit hole, because I thought the question of why we live in 3+1 was mainly a matter of footnotes and off-press debates. But it seems if was touched early by Weyl, Ehrenfest and Whitrow

https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol13-doc/764
1726959309657.png


1726959746222.png


And then elaborated for Schwarzchild metrics by Tangherlini, who seems to be the root citation nowadays.

Is there any other relevant literature? What have you read on the topic? How does modern theory evade Eherenfest's arguments?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
For higher dimensionality, it seems to me that one way is to have “extra dimensions” be microscopic.
 
robphy said:
For higher dimensionality, it seems to me that one way is to have “extra dimensions” be microscopic.
That is empirically, of course. But point is, mathematically? with extra dimensions the argument does not disappear; it has some extra discussion about what compactifcations are stable. The point of D=7+4...
 

Thread 'Parallel transport'

In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
View full post »

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top