The uniqueness of D=4

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arivero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Uniqueness
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 1K views
arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,500
Reaction score
204
TL;DR
Discussions about having 3 spacial dimensions
I have found an interesting rabbit hole, because I thought the question of why we live in 3+1 was mainly a matter of footnotes and off-press debates. But it seems if was touched early by Weyl, Ehrenfest and Whitrow

https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol13-doc/764
1726959309657.png


1726959746222.png


And then elaborated for Schwarzchild metrics by Tangherlini, who seems to be the root citation nowadays.

Is there any other relevant literature? What have you read on the topic? How does modern theory evade Eherenfest's arguments?
 

Attachments

Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
Physics news on Phys.org
robphy said:
For higher dimensionality, it seems to me that one way is to have “extra dimensions” be microscopic.
That is empirically, of course. But point is, mathematically? with extra dimensions the argument does not disappear; it has some extra discussion about what compactifcations are stable. The point of D=7+4...