The Void Phenomenon Explained (Tinker Conroy, computer sims)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computer Phenomenon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper "The Void Phenomenon Explained" by Jeremy L. Tinker and Charlie Conroy, which utilizes high-resolution N-body simulations and a halo occupation model to analyze the void phenomenon in galaxy distributions. The authors assert that their model, which links galaxy luminosity to dark matter halo mass, accurately predicts the existence of large voids (~15 Mpc/h) and aligns with statistical measures such as the luminosity function and nearest neighbor statistics of dwarf galaxies. Their findings support the notion that galaxy formation is primarily influenced by the mass of dark matter halos, independent of larger-scale environments, reinforcing the validity of the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) model.

PREREQUISITES
  • N-body simulations
  • Halo occupation model
  • Galaxy luminosity functions
  • Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced N-body simulation techniques
  • Study halo occupation distribution models in cosmology
  • Investigate the implications of the void probability function
  • Review statistical measures in galaxy formation research
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers in cosmology who are interested in galaxy formation, dark matter interactions, and the statistical analysis of galaxy distributions.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2475
The Void Phenomenon Explained
Jeremy L. Tinker (KICP, UChicago), Charlie Conroy (Princeton)
8 pages, 5 figures, submitted to ApJ
(Submitted on 16 Apr 2008)

"We use high-resolution N-body simulations, combined with a halo occupation model of galaxy bias, to investigate voids in the galaxy distribution. Our goal is to address the 'void phenomenon' of Peebles (2001), which presents the observed dearth of faint galaxies in voids as a challenge to the current cosmology. In our model, galaxy luminosity is determined only as a function of dark matter halo mass. With this simple assumption, we demonstrate that large, empty voids of ~15 Mpc/h in diameter are expected even for galaxies seven magnitudes fainter than L*. The predictions of our model are in excellent agreement with several statistical measures; (i) the luminosity function of galaxies in underdense regions, (ii) nearest neighbor statistics of dwarf galaxies, (iii) the void probability function of faint galaxies. In the transition between filaments and voids in the dark matter, the halo mass function changes abruptly, causing the maximum galaxy luminosity to decrease by ~5 magnitudes over a range of ~1 Mpc/h. Thus the boundary between filaments and voids in the galaxy distribution is nearly as sharp for dwarfs as for ~L* objects. These results support a picture in which galaxy formation is driven predominantly by the mass of the host dark matter halo, and is nearly independent of the larger-scale halo environment. Further, they demonstrate that LCDM, combined with a straightforward bias model, naturally explains the existence of the void phenomenon."
 
Space news on Phys.org
This paper looks interesting! It appears to be using N-body simulations and a halo occupation model to explain the "void phenomenon" as observed in the galaxy distribution. The authors claim that their model is in agreement with several statistical measures, including the luminosity function of galaxies in underdense regions, nearest neighbor statistics of dwarf galaxies, and the void probability function of faint galaxies. It seems like an interesting approach to understanding the relationship between dark matter halos and galaxy formation. Has anyone read this paper and have any thoughts about it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K