- #1

- 45

- 0

- Thread starter Rational T
- Start date

- #1

- 45

- 0

- #2

- 35,847

- 4,670

Can you describe what is this "wavefunction of the universe" that you seem to have a knowledge of?

Zz.

- #3

- 45

- 0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_wavefunctionCan you describe what is this "wavefunction of the universe" that you seem to have a knowledge of?

Zz.

The universe is obviously not is a supposition state, if it was we would not be here. Since wave-functions collapse if there is an observer, then an observer must have collapsed the wave-function of the universe. If not, how else did the wave-function of the universe collapse?

- #4

- 35,847

- 4,670

You should read your own source very carefully. Universal is NOT the same as "universe"!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_wavefunction

The universe is obviously not is a supposition state, if it was we would not be here. Since wave-functions collapse if there is an observer, then an observer must have collapsed the wave-function of the universe. If not, how else did the wave-function of the universe collapse?

Zz.

- #5

- 45

- 0

Saying "the wave-function of the universe" is theYou should read your own source very carefully. Universal is NOT the same as "universe"!

Zz.

The wave-function of the universe = The universal wave-function.

Since it takes an observer to collapse a wave-function, then it seems reasonable to assume that an observer collapsed the universal wave-function. If an observer did not collapse the universal wave-function, then what did? The universal wave-function obviously collapsed, or else we wouldn't be here and existence would just be in a quantum state of uncertainty.

This could all be completely wrong, but I would like to know

- #6

- 35,847

- 4,670

Zz.