The Well-Known Result: Rigorous or Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wdlang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rigorous
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
it is a well known result, but it is a rigorious result or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


tom.stoer said:
You mean Anderson localization?

yes.
 


In 1D, yes, it is fully rigorous. A quick google brings up references and papers --- too many to list here.
 


genneth said:
In 1D, yes, it is fully rigorous. A quick google brings up references and papers --- too many to list here.

I don't believe this. Even the Bloch's theorem is not dealt with rigorously, so how could the Anderson localization then? The Anderson localization looks like more complicated phenomenon than Bloch waves.
 


jostpuur said:
I don't believe this. Even the Bloch's theorem is not dealt with rigorously, so how could the Anderson localization then? The Anderson localization looks like more complicated phenomenon than Bloch waves.

no, bloch theorem is rigorious!