Theoretical, Experimental, Simulation, and end of story?

In summary, the conversation discusses the evolution of scientific tools, including experiments, theory, and simulation. The possibility of alternate dimensions is also mentioned. The speakers question if there could be a next frontier in scientific tools after simulation and conclude that while the use of computers has made simulations more efficient, the fundamental concept remains the same. Therefore, there is no new tool, but rather a refinement of existing ones.
  • #1
tampora
7
0
Theoretical, Experimental, Simulation, and... end of story?

I know that this question cannot be answered with any absolute authority, but I'd still like to hear some speculation.

Can there be a next frontier in the tools of science? Previously, we had experiments and theory. Later, simulation was created with the advent of the computer.

In analogy, we thought land, sea, and space was all that exists (heavens notwithstanding). Now, the possibility of alternate dimensions exist.

I don't think it would of been impossible for someone in the pre-computer age to envision what a computer simulation does. In that light, what could possibly follow simulation? It really feels like the end of the road.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Simulations in the pre-computer age were made with pen and paper. It is much more work, but everything you can simulate in the computer can be done by hand, too. Of course, if you have a supercomputer available you'll make the simulation "a bit" more complex ;).
 
  • #3


I agree with mfb, nothing a computer does is new. A computer has made doing extremely tedious and complicated tasks very very easy and efficient, but the fundamental concept is the same as it always was - simulations are simply doing calculations and making predictions based on a particular theory. It always comes down to observation -> theory -> prediction -> observation, perhaps not necessarily in that order.
 
  • #4


Simulation is nothing but prediction of theory. There's nothing new in it.
 
  • #5


I can understand the sentiment of feeling like we have reached the end of the road in terms of scientific tools. However, it is important to remember that science is a constantly evolving field and there is always room for growth and new discoveries. Just as the computer revolutionized the use of simulations, it is possible that new technologies and advancements could lead to even more powerful and advanced forms of simulation.

Additionally, there are still many unanswered questions and mysteries in the universe that we have yet to fully understand. Theoretical models and experiments are still crucial in helping us make sense of these complexities and could potentially lead to new breakthroughs.

Furthermore, the concept of alternate dimensions is still a theoretical concept and has yet to be fully proven or explored. It is possible that with further advancements in technology and our understanding of the universe, we may be able to delve deeper into this concept and potentially discover new frontiers.

In summary, while it may seem like we have exhausted all the tools of science, there is always the possibility of new advancements and discoveries that could push us even further. As scientists, it is our job to continue pushing the boundaries and exploring the unknown, even if it may seem like the end of the story.
 

1. What is the difference between theoretical, experimental, and simulation research?

Theoretical research involves developing and testing theories and models to explain a phenomenon, without conducting any physical experiments. Experimental research involves performing controlled experiments to test a hypothesis. Simulation research uses computer models to mimic real-world scenarios and gather data for analysis.

2. How do scientists decide which research method to use?

The choice of research method depends on the research question, available resources, and the nature of the phenomenon being studied. Theoretical research is suitable for developing new theories, experimental research is used to test cause-and-effect relationships, and simulation research can be used to study complex systems that are difficult to observe in real life.

3. What are the benefits of using simulations in research?

Simulations allow scientists to study complex systems that are difficult or impossible to observe in real life. They also provide a cost-effective and ethical way to conduct experiments, as well as the ability to manipulate different variables and observe their effects.

4. Can theoretical research be considered as valid as experimental research?

Yes, theoretical research is a valid form of scientific inquiry. Theories and models developed through theoretical research can be tested and verified through experimental or simulation research. However, it is important to note that all research methods have their own strengths and limitations, and they are often used in combination to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon.

5. How does research come to an end with "end of story"?

The phrase "end of story" is often used to indicate that a research project has reached its conclusion and that the results and conclusions are final. However, scientific research is an ongoing process and new discoveries can lead to further studies and revisions of previous conclusions. Therefore, research does not truly have an "end of story" and is constantly evolving.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top