Theory of Everything or Troll?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a set of equations circulating on the /sci/ boards of 4chan, purportedly linking the Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics. Participants express skepticism regarding the legitimacy of these equations, suggesting they may be a troll. A reference is made to the Standard Model Lagrangian, indicating a potential connection to established physics. Additionally, a mention of R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines' work titled "The Theory of Everything" from January 2000 is provided for comparative analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Standard Model Lagrangian
  • Familiarity with Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical physics
  • Awareness of online scientific discourse and trolling culture
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Standard Model Lagrangian and its components
  • Study Quantum Mechanics and its foundational equations
  • Examine R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines' "The Theory of Everything" for context
  • Explore the impact of online forums on scientific discussions and credibility
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the intersection of theoretical physics and online scientific discourse.

slayerjacket
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This set of equations has been going around on the /sci/ boards of 4chan lately, but hardly anybody there knows what it means due to the level of math involved.

hi5TV.jpg


Supposedly it links the Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics. Could anybody here provide any insight on what these equations mean?

Here is somebody saying that the equations fit into the Standard Model Langrangian:

8j564.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
¯\(°_o)/¯ I Dunno LOL ¯\(o_°)/¯

Since it's /sci/ I'd guess troll but I'll keep an eye out here just incase some of the big boys from round here decide to look at it regardless.
 
genericusrnme said:
¯\(°_o)/¯ I Dunno LOL ¯\(o_°)/¯

Since it's /sci/ I'd guess troll but I'll keep an eye out here just incase some of the big boys from round here decide to look at it regardless.

Much appreciated.

Here's another related post. These were actually deleted from the thread, and obviously /sci/ thinks it's some conspiracy to keep it under wraps, but it could just as well be the original poster deleting them himself for whatever reason (to troll or keep the info, idk):

nASaW.jpg
 
See R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines "The Theory of Everything", Jan. 2000., for purposes of comparison.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K