There are a,b>=0, such that |f(x)|<= ax+b

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exercise of proving that for a uniformly continuous function \( f: [0, +\infty) \to \mathbb{R} \), there exist non-negative constants \( a \) and \( b \) such that \( |f(x)| \leq ax + b \) for all \( x \geq 0 \). The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of properties of uniformly continuous functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with \( b = |f(0)| \) and explores how to find a suitable \( a \) based on the uniform continuity condition.
  • Another participant points out that a uniformly continuous function may not be differentiable, challenging the assumption that bounded derivatives are necessary.
  • A later reply discusses the converse, stating that a function with a bounded derivative is Lipschitz and thus uniformly continuous.
  • One participant claims that for any uniformly continuous function \( f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} \), there exist constants \( a, b > 0 \) such that \( |f(x)| \leq a|x| + b \), providing a proof involving a telescoping sum.
  • Another participant introduces a set of uniformly continuous functions and proposes properties of such functions, including operations on them.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the uniform continuity of specific functions like \( f(x) = x^\alpha \) for various values of \( \alpha \), with corrections made about the conditions under which these functions are uniformly continuous.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of uniform continuity, the necessity of differentiability, and the conditions under which certain functions are uniformly continuous. No consensus is reached regarding the best approach to proving the original statement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that uniform continuity does not imply differentiability, and there are discussions about the boundedness of derivatives and the implications for uniform continuity. The discussion also highlights the complexity of establishing conditions for specific functions.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hey! (Blush)

I have a question..I am given the following exercise:
Let $f:[0,+\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ uniformly continuous at $[0,+\infty)$.Prove that there are $a,b \geq 0$ such that $|f(x)| \leq ax+b , \forall x \geq 0$.
That's what I did so far:
$f:[0,+\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous at $[0,+\infty)$.
So: $\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0 $ such that $\forall x,y \in [0,+\infty)$ with $|x-y|<\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$..
But,how can I continue to show that there are $a,b \geq 0$ such that $|f(x)| \leq ax+b , \forall x \geq 0$?? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let $b=|f(0)|$. Suppose that for $\epsilon=1$ the corresponding $\delta$ is $0.1$. This means that from $0$ to $0.1$ the function $|f(x)|$ can grow at most by $1$. By the next $0.1$, $|f(x)|$ can grow at most by another $1$, and so on. Can you find a suitable $a$ in this case? Drawing a sketch may help.
 
evinda said:
Hey! (Blush)

I have a question..I am given the following exercise:
Let $f:[0,+\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ uniformly continuous at $[0,+\infty)$.Prove that there are $a,b \geq 0$ such that $|f(x)| \leq ax+b , \forall x \geq 0$.
That's what I did so far:
$f:[0,+\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous at $[0,+\infty)$.
So: $\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0 $ such that $\forall x,y \in [0,+\infty)$ with $|x-y|<\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$..
But,how can I continue to show that there are $a,b \geq 0$ such that $|f(x)| \leq ax+b , \forall x \geq 0$?? (Thinking)

If f(*) is uniformly continuous in $[a, + \infty)$ , then its derivative is bounded in the same inteval, i.e. it exists a constant M > 0 such that for any x in $[a, + \infty)$ is $\displaystyle |f^{\ '} (x)| > M$. In this case You can choose two constant a and b with b > M such that is $\displaystyle |a + b\ x|> |f(x)|$ for any x in $[a, + \infty)$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
If f(*) is uniformly continuous in $[a, + \infty)$ , then its derivative is bounded in the same inteval
A function may be uniformly continuous without being differentiable: see StackExchange.
 
Actually what follows, it's the converse:

Let $f:A\subset\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ be with bounded derivative then $f$ is Lipschitz on $A,$ hence, uniformly continuous.
 
Now, more generally:

Let $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ be a uniform continuous function, then exist $a,b>0$ such that $|f(x)|\le a|x|+b.$

Let $\delta > 0$ be such that $|x-y|\le \delta \implies |f(x)-f(y)| < 1$.

Claim: $|f(x)| \le \frac{2}{\delta}|x| +|f(0)|$ for all $x$.

Proof: WLOG, $x>0,$ so $x\in [n \delta, (n+1) \delta)$ for some $n\in \{0,1,\dots\}$. Write $f(x)$ as a telescoping sum using multiples of $\delta,$ then slap on absolute values. We get \[|f(x)| \le |f(x) -f(n \delta)| +|f(n \delta)-f((n-1) \delta)| + \cdots + |f( \delta)-f(0)|+ |f(0)|\]
So this implies that $|f(x)|\le 1+n + |f(0)|.$ If $n>0,$ the latter expresion can be rewritten as $\frac{(n+1)}{n\delta}n\delta + |f(0)| \le \frac{2}{\delta}|x| + |f(0)|.$ If $n=0,$ the claim holds.

So the case here, it's actually $|f(x)|\le ax+b$ since $x\in[0,\infty).$
 
I'm not a mathematician and one consequence of that is that I don't consider any type of 'pathological function', the fate of which should be to be closed for life in a 'hospital for incurables' with benefit for all us! :cool:...

Hoping to be absolved for that, since there are uniformly continuous functions 'nowhere differentiable', let's try to find a more general solution of thye proposed question. It is not limitative to suppose f(*) a positive non decreasing uniformly continuous function in $[0, + \infty)$ and we indicate with $\Phi(*)$ the set of such functions. The following propositions are easy to be demonstrated...

a) if $f(*) \in \Phi(*)$ and a>0 then $a\ f(*) \in \Phi(*)$...

b) if $f(*) \in \Phi(*)$ and $g(*) \in \Phi(*)$ then $f(*) + g(*) \in \Phi(*)$...

A little more complex but feasible is to demonstrate the following theorem...

c) the function $f(x) = x^{a}$ is uniformly continuous in $[0, + \infty)$ if and only if $0 \le a \le 1$

Consequence of a), b) and c) is that, given a>0 and b>0, $g(x) = a x + b \in \Phi(*)$ and because value of a and b for which $g(*) = f(*) + h(*)$ being $h(*) \in \Phi(*)$ exist, the OP has been demonstrated. If necessary the demonstration of c) will be supplied...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
It is not limitative to suppose f(*) a positive non decreasing uniformly continuous function in $[0, + \infty)$ and we indicate with $\Phi(*)$ the set of such functions. The following propositions are easy to be demonstrated...

a) if $f(*) \in \Phi(*)$ and a>0 then $a\ f(*) \in \Phi(*)$...

b) if $f(*) \in \Phi(*)$ and $g(*) \in \Phi(*)$ then $f(*) + g(*) \in \Phi(*)$...

A little more complex but feasible is to demonstrate the following theorem...

c) the function $f(x) = x^{a}$ is uniformly continuous in $[0, + \infty)$ if and only if $0 \le a \le 1$
Unfortunately the function $f(x) = x^\alpha$ is not uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ for $\alpha<1$. In fact, $f'(x) = \alpha x^{\alpha-1}$, which becomes unbounded as $x\to0$. A function with an unbounded derivative can never be uniformly continuous. So the only value of $\alpha$ for which the function is uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ is $\alpha=1.$

Examples of 'non-pathological' functions in the set $\Phi(*)$ include $(x+1)^\alpha$ (for $0\leqslant \alpha\leqslant 1$), $\arctan x$ and $\tanh x$.

*Edit* See retraction below! I was confusing uniform continuity with Lipschitz continuity when I wrote the above nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
Unfortunately the function $f(x) = x^\alpha$ is not uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ for $\alpha<1$. In fact, $f'(x) = \alpha x^{\alpha-1}$, which becomes unbounded as $x\to0$. A function with an unbounded derivative can never be uniformly continuous. So the only value of $\alpha$ for which the function is uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ is $\alpha=1.$

Examples of 'non-pathological' functions in the set $\Phi(*)$ include $(x+1)^\alpha$ (for $0\leqslant \alpha\leqslant 1$), $\arctan x$ and $\tanh x$.

I have to confess to be a little embarassed at this point, because I remember that a 'classical' example of uniformly continuous function on $[0, + \infty)$ is $f(x)= \sqrt{x}$. Among the [numerous] posts on Web about this argument there is the following...

Show that sqrt(x) is uniformly continuous on [0,infinity) - Math Help Forum

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #10
chisigma said:
I have to confess to be a little embarassed at this point, because I remember that a 'classical' example of uniformly continuous function on $[0, + \infty)$ is $f(x)= \sqrt{x}$. Among the [numerous] posts on Web about this argument there is the following...

Show that sqrt(x) is uniformly continuous on [0,infinity) - Math Help Forum

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Now it's my turn to be embarrassed, because of course $x^\alpha$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ when $0\leqslant \alpha \leqslant 1.$ I must be getting old. (Worried)
 
  • #11
Opalg said:
Now it's my turn to be embarrassed, because of course $x^\alpha$ is uniformly continuous on $[0,\infty)$ when $0\leqslant \alpha \leqslant 1.$ I must be getting old. (Worried)

... not only You! (Worried)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K