A Thermality & Nonthermality of Radiation in Curved Spacetimes

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bukhari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
bukhari
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been reading some material related to the thermal and non-thermal features of Hawking-Unruh radiation. It seems some authors label any radiation that emanates within curved spacetimes (including non-inertial frames) either as non-thermal or approximately thermal if it doesn't follow a typical Planckian character, which in other words means it is hard to associate a characteristic temperature with the radiation. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.025023, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)009. On the other hand, some associate thermality with the radiation even if it doesn't display Planckian feautures. In one of the papers, e.g., https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11933 , authors say the thermality is when an Unruh-DeWitt detector asymptotically reaches a Gibbs thermal state (with connections to Kubo-Martin-Schwinger condition) without having anything to do with Planckian distribution. I am totally confused how to draw the line between thermality and non-thermality of acceleration/Hawking radiation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Moved thread to relativity forum and marked thread level as "A".
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top