A Thermality & Nonthermality of Radiation in Curved Spacetimes

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bukhari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
bukhari
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been reading some material related to the thermal and non-thermal features of Hawking-Unruh radiation. It seems some authors label any radiation that emanates within curved spacetimes (including non-inertial frames) either as non-thermal or approximately thermal if it doesn't follow a typical Planckian character, which in other words means it is hard to associate a characteristic temperature with the radiation. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.025023, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)009. On the other hand, some associate thermality with the radiation even if it doesn't display Planckian feautures. In one of the papers, e.g., https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11933 , authors say the thermality is when an Unruh-DeWitt detector asymptotically reaches a Gibbs thermal state (with connections to Kubo-Martin-Schwinger condition) without having anything to do with Planckian distribution. I am totally confused how to draw the line between thermality and non-thermality of acceleration/Hawking radiation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moderator's note: Moved thread to relativity forum and marked thread level as "A".
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top