Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the auction of the domain name thescienceforum.com and the implications of potentially acquiring it. Participants explore the feasibility of running a new science forum, the value of the domain, and the existing competition with established sites like Physics Forums (PF).
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express intrigue about the auction of thescienceforum.com, questioning whether it is a turnkey operation or just the domain name.
- Others argue that creating another science site may not be necessary given the existence of PF, which they consider to be the best science forum available.
- There are claims that the current bid for the domain may not reflect its true value, with some suggesting it could be a marketing tactic by GoDaddy.
- Participants discuss the potential of redirecting the domain to PF instead of creating a new site.
- Some express skepticism about the viability of the domain, questioning its past existence and current value.
- There are differing views on whether the existence of more science forums would benefit or harm PF.
- Concerns are raised about the costs associated with acquiring and maintaining the domain, including renewal fees.
- Some participants suggest researching the history of the domain to understand its current status and value.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally disagree on the necessity and feasibility of acquiring thescienceforum.com, with some advocating for the idea while others question its value and practicality. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for a new science forum versus the existing competition.
Contextual Notes
There are uncertainties regarding the actual status of thescienceforum.com, with some participants suggesting it may never have existed as an active site. The discussion also reflects varying opinions on the implications of creating another science forum in relation to PF.