This arxiv.org article talks about a "maximum force"

[gibberingmouther]

So, I have nowhere near the level of understanding to evaluate this article I found: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0309118

From the abstract:
" a maximum force implies the field equations of general relativity. The maximum force in nature is thus equivalent to the full theory of general relativity. Taken together, the three fundamental principles imply a bound for every physical observable, from acceleration to size"
and:
"Among others, a maximum force and thus a minimum length imply that the non-continuity of space-time is an inevitable result of the unification of quantum theory and relativity."

I know no one is going to have the time to read this article, but based on your knowledge of physics is it reasonable? Could there be a maximum possible force, a minimum length, and space-time that is non-continuous? I was thinking about whether time or space could be discrete or continuous a lot when putting my game together, but my understanding was that no one knows. Kind of curious.

I want to know for my game of course. It's hard deciding on what the upper power limits should be. I was able to come up with some equations for my powers, and I know what *kinds* of equations they should be (i.e., exponential, linear, or logarithmic) but not necessarily the literal numbers.

Game balance plays a role, but I am trying to converge on numbers that make the most sense. Some of you will say, I know, "it's just a game and the numbers could be whatever you want" but I think there is a range of numbers that will be most reasonable for most powers.

For example, past a certain fraction of the speed of light time dilation and length contraction make going that fast for a superhero not very practical.

EDIT: Okay, the value is 3*10^43 Newtons, so on second thought this is waaaaay past anything I would have in my game. But the article is still interesting, unless it's completely wrong.

EDIT2: Maybe it's not too long to read! Really interesting for me based on my interest in sci fi, but I don't know enough physics to judge the veracity of the claims.

 

[fresh_42]

You might get (better) answers, if you managed to extract some specific questions and posted them in the Classical Physics or another technical forum. Of course, you won't be able to talk about a game set-up there. Not sure, whether this mixture of both does you a favor.

"Among others, a maximum force and thus a minimum length imply that the non-continuity of space-time is an inevitable result of the unification of quantum theory and relativity."

At which scale does your game setup take place?

Anyway, I have serious doubts that this paper will be worth reading.

 

[Vanadium 50]

This paper is pure crackpottery from a known crackpot.

Furthermore, it is from a known crackpot who is known to join internet forums under pseudonyms to "shill" his work. I'm not saying you're necessarily one of them. Just that this is his pattern.

Additionally, this isn't Science Fiction. My objection to the creation of this forum is that it would become the dustbin for discussions that were not allowed elsewhere on PF, and that's exactly what's happening.

 

[Klystron]

Yeah, I agree this paper probably does not help you. The general concept of limits, minimums, and maximums can help design your framework including "natural" limits (on the game space) for user acquired 'local' variables such as maximum_acquired_strength; and certainly on global game parameters such as maximum_applied_force.

programming suggestions:

1. build a list of accepted min/max physical values such as Planck length from peer reviewed sources.
2. normalize the values to fit your requirements and choose consistent limits or boundaries on all internal variables.
3. regulate game-supplied user-acquired variable using some fair algorithms.
4. Create and maintain an overall (pulsed) frame rate. Monitor and control processes and routines giving special attention to error conditions and frame overruns. Take advantage of rapid computer processing compared to relatively slow human inputs.

Sorry, for the crude notes. Let me know if this helps you organize your game space.

 

[gibberingmouther]

This paper is pure crackpottery from a known crackpot.

Furthermore, it is from a known crackpot who is known to join internet forums under pseudonyms to "shill" his work. I'm not saying you're necessarily one of them. Just that this is his pattern.

Additionally, this isn't Science Fiction. My objection to the creation of this forum is that it would become the dustbin for discussions that were not allowed elsewhere on PF, and that's exactly what's happening.

Thank you for telling me, but I'm a little upset about your accusation. If you'd looked at my other posts, you'd have seen a pattern. I was making a tabletop game and I wanted to know about power limits for gods and so on. I've been on here awhile, and besides my recent posts about my tabletop rpg, my posts have all been about understanding basic physics. I'm a student and I am planning to minor in physics, thus am taking some physics courses.

I could have asked any of my questions elsewhere on physics forums, but Science Fiction was the best for questions about game physics. Game physics is a thing, and it's not something that you shouldn't allow on physics forums - there's a difference between trying to understand physics well enough to do a good job of world building and trying to promote crackpot physics ideas because of hidden motives.

I'm upset that you have attacked me like this without knowing anything about my activity here on physics forums by looking at my other recent posts. Anyway, we might as well close or delete this thread. Maybe close it so people will know about the thing that "tricked" me.

 

[gibberingmouther]

Yeah, I agree this paper probably does not help you. The general concept of limits, minimums, and maximums can help design your framework including "natural" limits (on the game space) for user acquired 'local' variables such as maximum_acquired_strength; and certainly on global game parameters such as maximum_applied_force.

programming suggestions:

1. build a list of accepted min/max physical values such as Planck length from peer reviewed sources.
2. normalize the values to fit your requirements and choose consistent limits or boundaries on all internal variables.
3. regulate game-supplied user-acquired variable using some fair algorithms.
4. Create and maintain an overall (pulsed) frame rate. Monitor and control processes and routines giving special attention to error conditions and frame overruns. Take advantage of rapid computer processing compared to relatively slow human inputs.

Sorry, for the crude notes. Let me know if this helps you organize your game space.

Yeah, even the gods are way below the power of the over-god, and the over-god doesn't interact with mortals typically - he's just there to make sure the gods play by the rules and to maybe to prune timelines. So, if there were limits for a fictional world whose physics is loosely based on our own universes physics, even the gods should be well below those limits.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Thank you for telling me, but I'm a little upset about your accusation

What accusation?

I did not say you were a Christopher Schiller sockpuppet. I did say he creates a lot of sockpuppets, and they come in, purporting to be interested in something else, and lo and behold they have discovered this really interesting paper. He does.

I also complained that this section ends up hosting discussions that would not be allowed elsewhere. Like the crackpot paper you referenced. You didn't need to, you know. If you were interested only in game mechanics and not discussing the crackpot paper, you could have said "I'm interested in setting up game mechanics so that there is an upper limit on acceleration [or whatever] without any mention of the crackpot paper. But you didn't - in fact, the paper is in your thread's title. So you might disagree with my opinion on the relevance, but I don't think "I'm only designing a game" is a good excuse to discuss crackpottery.

 

[gibberingmouther]

What accusation?

I did not say you were a Christopher Schiller sockpuppet. I did say he creates a lot of sockpuppets, and they come in, purporting to be interested in something else, and lo and behold they have discovered this really interesting paper. He does.

I also complained that this section ends up hosting discussions that would not be allowed elsewhere. Like the crackpot paper you referenced. You didn't need to, you know. If you were interested only in game mechanics and not discussing the crackpot paper, you could have said "I'm interested in setting up game mechanics so that there is an upper limit on acceleration [or whatever] without any mention of the crackpot paper. But you didn't - in fact, the paper is in your thread's title. So you might disagree with my opinion on the relevance, but I don't think "I'm only designing a game" is a good excuse to discuss crackpottery.

Yeah, but most people don't come close to knowing enough physics to realize that this guy is a crackpot. I know Newton's three laws and kinematics and some other stuff from the physics course I just took, but I don't know much beyond that at the level of being able to work with and understand the math. Knowing a maximum force could be relevant to my game world and searching for that is how I found the article.

I didn't mean to sound super upset or anything, I was just trying to defend myself and make a point about why real physics is important to world building for games or other fiction. I'm glad you warned me about this guy, and now I know to maybe ask around a little more before I make threads like this.

 

[chasrob]

I'm an SF writer and have a limited background in physics also. I used the concept of a maximum force, from Schiller, in a story, not knowing any better. However, Barrow and Gibbons of Cambridge seemed to have bought into it.

 

[Klystron]

Table top framework precludes electronics including computers? I overlooked that in your other posts. How do you introduce randomness in your game: shuffle cards, roll dice (cubic?), spin a pointer, an analogue clock? Your choice of method influences how you construct the rules in your game.

Tabletop board games require cooperation and agreement among the players, one of the reasons they remain popular. A rule based system still sounds useful. Limit the "force parameters" as you say with both minimum and maximum values. Consider changing religious terms such as gods to physically grounded terms. For instance, back when 'secret societies' were the rage, mathematicians like d'Alembert eschewed religion and adopted titles such as 'psychopomp' and 'mage-magister' at society meetings. Consider changing 'god' to terms such as judge and over-god to Supreme Advocate, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_le_Rond_d'Alembert
Information about d'Alembert's role in Tradition comes from Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum.

 

[gibberingmouther]

Table top framework precludes electronics including computers? I overlooked that in your other posts. How do you introduce randomness in your game: shuffle cards, roll dice (cubic?), spin a pointer, an analogue clock? Your choice of method influences how you construct the rules in your game.

Tabletop board games require cooperation and agreement among the players, one of the reasons they remain popular. A rule based system still sounds useful. Limit the "force parameters" as you say with both minimum and maximum values. Consider changing religious terms such as gods to physically grounded terms. For instance, back when 'secret societies' were the rage, mathematicians like d'Alembert eschewed religion and adopted titles such as 'psychopomp' and 'mage-magister' at society meetings. Consider changing 'god' to terms such as judge and over-god to Supreme Advocate, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_le_Rond_d'Alembert
Information about d'Alembert's role in Tradition comes from Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum.
View attachment 237029

The random element comes from rolling six sided dice. I am using 4th edition GURPS with some customization which will be described in the game manual. For people who don't want to buy the books, I will talk about how you can use GURPS lite and your own imagination to possibly run a game. Though it's best just to buy the books - you can get them in PDF form for your computer or phone. I didn't invent GURPS, which stands for Generic Universal Role Playing System, but in my opinion it's the best system out there for running this kind of game.

A spirit realm and spirits are important parts of the metaphysics of my game world. The idea is that the whole game world is literally made out of imagination. It is mental first and the physical aspect of it is in a way an illusion - just like a dream.

So, gods are just spirits who are very very smart and whose spirit forms are a little different from the spirits of mortals. What is a spirit? Besides that it's made out of mental energy (I call it energy because it can interact with matter in limited ways, thus doing *work* on it) I don't really have a precise definition. It's like invisible weightless matter I guess.

 

[Klystron]

The random element comes from rolling six sided dice. I am using 4th edition GURPS with some customization which will be described in the game manual. For people who don't want to buy the books, I will talk about how you can use GURPS lite and your own imagination to possibly run a game. Though it's best just to buy the books - you can get them in PDF form for your computer or phone. I didn't invent GURPS, which stands for Generic Universal Role Playing System, but in my opinion it's the best system out there for running this kind of game.

A spirit realm and spirits are important parts of the metaphysics of my game world. The idea is that the whole game world is literally made out of imagination. It is mental first and the physical aspect of it is in a way an illusion - just like a dream.

So, gods are just spirits who are very very smart and whose spirit forms are a little different from the spirits of mortals. What is a spirit? Besides that it's made out of mental energy (I call it energy because it can interact with matter in limited ways, thus doing *work* on it) I don't really have a precise definition. It's like invisible weightless matter I guess.

Thanks for explaining GURPS. Rolling standard 6-sided dice makes good sense. The probabilities and expected values are well documented in probably every basic statistics textbook.

My objection to religious overtones in game terminology is twofold:

1. Religion and "pure fantasy" terms contradict the goal of physical limits within the game framework.
2. Risks turning away players (non-believers) who prefer physical accuracy and consistent game environment.

Concur with vital influence of spiritual quests and goals in creating the game world. While I'm a card player, I usually do not enjoy games on a moral level where the object is to deceive and ultimately destroy the other players (poker, hearts). Partnership games like Rook, Spades and some forms of Whist and Rummy -- highly competitive -- can be truly friendly, cooperate to surpass opponents without destroying them (mentally).

Also agree that the game is a product of imagination that comes alive in the minds of the participants and observers during play. Creation becomes a shared experience. With well established rules in play, Physics may provide limits on values and attributes but also provides methods to measure and record game play. Statistics on player interactions, cross-talk, and scenes can be recorded (with permission!) for post-game gathering. Polls and questionnaires become part of play, book-ending action sequences while providing guidance (policy) on future plays.