This is what happens to an aluminum block when it hits...
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the impact of a 0.5 ounce piece of plastic hitting an aluminum block at a speed of 15,000 mph, exploring the implications of such an event in space versus controlled conditions on Earth. Participants examine the physics of hypervelocity impacts, the authenticity of claims regarding the damage caused, and the characteristics of the materials involved.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- Some participants assert that even small objects can become powerful projectiles at hypervelocity, potentially causing significant damage.
- Others question the authenticity of the claims regarding the impact, noting that the test was conducted under optimal conditions on Earth rather than in space.
- A participant calculates the kinetic energy of the projectile and expresses skepticism about whether it could cause the observed damage to the aluminum block.
- Some participants discuss the differences in material properties, suggesting that the type of aluminum alloy used could affect the results of the impact.
- There are mentions of alternative methods of propulsion for the projectile, such as light-gas guns, and discussions about the mechanics of high-speed impacts.
- Several participants engage in detailed calculations regarding the energy involved in the impact and its implications for the damage done to the aluminum.
- Some participants reference experimental data from other high-velocity impacts to provide context for the discussion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the authenticity of the claims regarding the impact or the adequacy of the kinetic energy calculations. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of the impact and the characteristics of the materials involved.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved questions about the assumptions made in the calculations, the specific conditions of the impact test, and the properties of the materials used. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and calculations that have not been definitively settled.
- 24,477
- 8,745
This is a test, done here on Earth, under optimal conditions, not an actual impact in space.
"An anonymous user on Reddit, who apparently works in the aerospace field, posted an image of what a 1/2oz of space debris can do to a block of solid aluminum. This test was done by a light-gas gun in close quarters and shows how much damage even a tiny amount of space debris can do: "
https://bigthink.com/news/heres-the-damage-a-tiny-speck-of-space-debris-can-do-at-15000mphBTW, because of the lens, the pic looks darned impressive, but the crater is (only) 5 inches deep. That makes it about 10 inches across.
- 35,014
- 21,715
DaveC426913 said:This is a test, done here on Earth, under optimal conditions, not an actual impact in space.
My first question was "why would anyone want to launch an aluminum block?"
- 5,621
- 1,774
- 167
- 104
That half-ounce piece of plastic probably packed a many times more kinetic energy than a bullet fired from a 50-caliber rifle.
- 5,022
- 2,562
Who knew?

- 2,778
- 2,280
- 69,529
- 25,108
Ask Elon...Vanadium 50 said:My first question was "why would anyone want to launch an aluminum block?"
- 82
- 29
- 24,477
- 8,745
No. "Light-gas gun".HankDorsett said:Electromagnetic railgun?
Whatever that is.
- 82
- 29
The damage is proportional to the Kinetic energy imparted:
KE = 1/2 m v2...
so i ran the numbers & unfort the Physics doesn't add up.
(NB: 15000mph = 6705.6 meters/sec)
KE = 1/2 x 0.014kg x (6705 x 6705)
= 1/2 x 0.014 x 44 957 025
= 1/2 x 629 398.35
= 314 699 Joules
So it's only:
314.699kJ = 75.3 calories = 0.0875 Kilowatt Hours or
in other words; enough energy to run your 1000W (1kW) radiator
for 0.0875 of an hour...5.25mins
(or for comparison: 564 calories in a Big Mac... so about 1/8th of a burger)
I severely doubt that is enough energy
to spiflicate a solid block of Aluminium like that!
- 1,969
- 2,433
- 1,969
- 2,433
You are thinking about this wrong. 315 kJ corresponds to .16 lbs of tnt. It is a lot of energy.yelelafella said:No way!
The damage is proportional to the Kinetic energy imparted:
KE = 1/2 m v2...
so i ran the numbers & unfort the Physics doesn't add up.
(NB: 15000mph = 6705.6 meters/sec)
KE = 1/2 x 0.014kg x (6705 x 6705)
= 1/2 x 0.014 x 44 957 025
= 1/2 x 629 398.35
= 314 699 Joules
So it's only:
314.699kJ = 75.3 calories = 0.0875 Kilowatt Hours or
in other words; enough energy to run your 1000W (1kW) radiator
for 0.0875 of an hour...5.25mins
(or for comparison: 564 calories in a Big Mac... so about 1/8th of a burger)
I severely doubt that is enough energy
to spiflicate a solid block of Aluminium like that!
- 5,661
- 4,508
315 kJ ≈ 75 300 calories.
(food calories are actually kilocalories)
Density of Aluminum: 2.7g/cc
Specific Heat of Aluminum: 0.89J/g
Melting point of Aluminum: 660C
(660 - 20) * 0.89 = 570J/g
Heat of fusion for Aluminum: 380J/g
315 000/(570 + 380) = 332g (or 123cc) of Aluminum is liquified
Heat of vaporization for Aluminum: 11 370J/g
315 000/(570 + 380 + 11 370) = 25.6g (or 9.5cc) of Aluminum is vaporized
Cheers,
Tom
(Yup, I'm bored tonite!
- 1,969
- 2,433
Before anyone asks, melt and vaporization are a small percentage of crater volume. Most of it is from deformation and failure.Tom.G said:25.6g (or 9.5cc) of Aluminum is vaporized
- 4,229
- 2,245
a giant spit-ball-machine using H2 OR He for propulsionDaveC426913 said:No. "Light-gas gun".
Whatever that is.
- 1,969
- 2,433
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-gas_gun256bits said:a giant spit-ball-machine using H2 OR He for propulsion
- 4,229
- 2,245
That's not all that was spificated.yelelafella said:No way!
The damage is proportional to the Kinetic energy imparted:
KE = 1/2 m v2...
so i ran the numbers & unfort the Physics doesn't add up.
(NB: 15000mph = 6705.6 meters/sec)
KE = 1/2 x 0.014kg x (6705 x 6705)
= 1/2 x 0.014 x 44 957 025
= 1/2 x 629 398.35
= 314 699 Joules
So it's only:
314.699kJ = 75.3 calories = 0.0875 Kilowatt Hours or
in other words; enough energy to run your 1000W (1kW) radiator
for 0.0875 of an hour...5.25mins
(or for comparison: 564 calories in a Big Mac... so about 1/8th of a burger)
I severely doubt that is enough energy
to spiflicate a solid block of Aluminium like that!
The reddit poster doesn't know his conversions from metric to english
The crater is much more to be 5cm dia ( multipying by 2 doesn't give 10 inches )
Not so sure about the mass of the projectile, but it could be 14g
Anyways, find the volume of the crater, find the energy to melt that amount of Al, and your 315J should in the ballpark.
Before anyone asks, melt and vaporization are a small percentage of crater volume. Most of it is from deformation and failure.
@Frabjous I did say ballpark.
- 2,778
- 2,280
To put it in perspective, TNT with a density of 1.65 gm/cc, for 75gms, is a cube about 3.5 cm on a side.Frabjous said:You are thinking about this wrong. 315 kJ corresponds to .16 lbs of tnt. It is a lot of energy.
- 2,456
- 3,569
Lead bullet at 1000 FPS on a solid steel plate splashes without denting the plate.
Lead bullet at 2000 FPS on a 2" thick solid steel plate makes a crater that my little finger tip fits into. And some of the lead splashes almost straight back. There are significant challenges making lead bullets work at that velocity, but handloaders like to do this sort of thing. Not me, but I was there.
It is easier to understand the dynamics of high speed impact if you assume that the projectile is a liquid, calculate the velocity pressure (##0.5 * \rho * V^2##), and compare to the compressive strength of the projectile.
- 2,778
- 2,280
- 1,969
- 2,433
I dug up a scaling law for geomaterials, (ρY3)-.25, and it predicted a new crater volume equal to V0/3.7. If one assumes that it retains the same shape, the new lengths are l0/1.5.gleem said:They may have used Al for effect. Also, we do not know what alloy of Al was used. Even among Al alloys, there is a significant difference in strength. If they had used Stainless Steel for example the results would not have been as dramatic. SS has 3 to 4 times the tensile strength of Al alloys plus it is twice as dense and has a melting point twice that of Al. Anyway, it would be interesting to see what would have happened.
Star Trek never touched on mass weapons, focusing primarily on energy weapons. However; Mass weapons can not only be destroyers of huge massive ships like what the Borg cube is supposed to be. They could also be planet destroyers. If we ever encountered another race is space. We would have to peacefully coexist, because they would undoubtedly be as familiar with mass weapons as we are and an all out war would mean mutually complete destruction.Choppy said:So it turns out the way to defeat the Borg was a 0.5 ounce piece of plastic traveling at 15,000 mph.
Who knew?
View attachment 248756
On another note: This could be added to the long lists of possibilities, of why we have not seen evidence of other races. What if everytime 2 space faring races meet they completely destroy each other?
- 426
- 633
Definitely late to the party, but I suspect the use of aluminum is because that's a very commonly used spaceframe material. Much of the ISS structure is aluminum alloys, iirc.gleem said:They may have used Al for effect. Also, we do not know what alloy of Al was used. Even among Al alloys, there is a significant difference in strength. If they had used Stainless Steel for example the results would not have been as dramatic. SS has 3 to 4 times the tensile strength of Al alloys plus it is twice as dense and has a melting point twice that of Al. Anyway, it would be interesting to see what would have happened.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 17 ·
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 5K
- · Replies 27 ·
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 8K
- · Replies 6 ·
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 28K
- · Replies 16 ·
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 37 ·
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 6K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 3K