Those With Science Backgrounds Are Good Spellers

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Point Conception
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothesis that individuals with science backgrounds have comparable spelling abilities to those with non-science backgrounds, particularly at the same level of formal education. Participants share personal experiences and opinions related to spelling, language, and the influence of educational backgrounds.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that good spelling may correlate with conscientious attention to detail, which could be beneficial in scientific fields.
  • Others argue that individual experiences, such as hearing impairments, can significantly affect spelling abilities, regardless of educational background.
  • A participant mentions Einstein's poor spelling despite his scientific prowess, suggesting that spelling may not be a priority for some science majors.
  • Several participants share personal anecdotes about their struggles with spelling, often linked to language pronunciation and background.
  • One participant highlights the importance of spell-check technology in their life, indicating a reliance on tools to assist with spelling.
  • Another participant reiterates the null hypothesis, suggesting that the challenge is to demonstrate that science majors may be poorer spellers than their non-science counterparts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between science backgrounds and spelling abilities. Multiple competing views remain regarding the influence of personal experiences and the relevance of spelling in scientific education.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference personal experiences with language and spelling that may not be universally applicable. The conversation includes anecdotal evidence and opinions rather than empirical data.

Point Conception
Gold Member
Messages
1,159
Reaction score
1,879
Null hypothesis, Ho Those with science backgrounds can spell as well as those with non-science backgrounds, at the same formal education level. Only looking for opinions not a p-value.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Don't know. I can smell good, though.
 
Probably true, but only if you average over education that doesn't require you to write much, e.g. music degree.
 
In my experience, good spelling correlates strongly with conscientious attention to detail in general.

This can lead to success in many areas, including science.
 
Einstein was a horrible speller. After moving to the US, Einstein became completely bilingual but could never recall how to spell words correctly in both German and English.
He was good at science.
 
I have a hard time spelling English words because I pronounce everything with a Spanish accent. I have a hard time spelling Spanish words because I basically stopped writing in Spanish at the age of 10. I am just terrible at life =[.
 
I'm one of the worst spellers IMO. I know what it's like not being able to hear at a young age and trying to figure out how to spell.

Abstract

Children with unilateral hearing loss have been considered to have few, if any, communication or academic difficulties. This study was designed to evaluate the academic achievement, cognitive ability, psycholinguistic, and social skills of a group of 25 monaurally hearing-impaired compared with 25 nonhearing-impaired children. Results indicated no significant differences between the two groups on cognitive or self-concept measures. However, the unilateral group had significantly lower scores on academic tests of word recognition, spelling, and language. The unilateral group was more likely to have repeated a grade, needed special education resource help, or additional tutoring in school. Within the unilateral group, children with severe-to-profound hearing loss had significantly lower WISC-R full scale I.Q.s as compared to the group with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The results of this study suggest that monaural deafness, especially when severe to profound, may be associated with cognitive and academic deficits, as well as secondary behavioral adjustment problems.

(C) Williams & Wilkins 1986. All Rights Reserved.

http://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/Abstract/1986/02000/Children_with_Unilateral_Sensorineural_Hearing.7.aspx
 
My life would be vastly different without spell-check.
 
  • #10
OmCheeto said:
I love Miss Pelling.

See: spacemites

and her sister, who coined the phrase; "a cute little angle"

:wink:
Well, I found ways to remember the correct spelling of certain words. e.g.

weird.png


http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling
 
  • #11
MarneMath said:
I have a hard time spelling English words because I pronounce everything with a Spanish accent. I have a hard time spelling Spanish words because I basically stopped writing in Spanish at the age of 10.

Opposite for me, and I'm a Spanish national. If I speak English, I pass for a yank wherever I go. But even though my writing in Spanish is decent, my colloquial Spanish has always been slightly weird to most people as I generally think up statements in English first.
 
  • #12
dipole said:
My life would be vastly different without spell-check.
Lol... my life became vastly different with spell-check.

http://www.jir.com/pullet.html



OCR... :biggrin:
 
  • #13
morrobay said:
Null hypothesis, Ho Those with science backgrounds can spell as well as those with non-science backgrounds, at the same formal education level. Only looking for opinions not a p-value.

Actually the Null hypothesis is a challenge - to try and show that the Ho
statement is wrong, to overturn it. By testing it statistically in order answer an underlying
question: In the above Ho you want to show that science majors are poor
spellers compared to non- science majors. Because maybe and in my opinion good spelling is not a priority for them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K