Graduate Thought experiment in relativistic quantum mechanics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a thought experiment in relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM) involving a particle in superposition and the sudden activation of an interaction potential, H_{int}. The increase in average energy, \langle \Delta E \rangle, is calculated using radial symmetry. The paradox arises when considering two observers in space-like separation, leading to different observations regarding the timing of the potential activation and energy measurement. The consensus is that a first-quantization formalism fails to address these causality issues, necessitating the use of quantum field theory (QFT) for resolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM)
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of the sudden approximation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of space-time geometry and causality
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the sudden approximation in quantum mechanics in detail
  • Explore the textbook "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schroeder
  • Review "Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics" by Schwartz for a deeper understanding of RQM
  • Investigate the implications of space-like separation in relativistic quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring the foundations of relativistic quantum theories.

Someone_physics
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Background
---
Consider the following thought experiment in the setting of relativistic quantum mechanics (not QFT). I have a particle in superposition of the position basis:

H | \psi \rangle = E | \psi \rangle

Now I suddenly turn on an interaction potential H_{int} localized at r_o = (x_o,y_o,z_o) at time t_o:

$$
H_{int}(r) =
\begin{cases}
k & r \leq r_r' \\
0 & r > r'
\end{cases}
$$

where r is the radial coordinate and r' is the radius of the interaction of the potential with origin (x_o,y_o,z_o). By the logic of the sudden approximation out state has not had enough time to react. Thus the increase in average energy is:

\langle \Delta E \rangle = 4 \pi k \int_0^{r'} |\psi(r,\theta,\phi)|^2 d r

(assuming radial symmetry).

Now, let's say while the potential is turned on at t_0 I also perform a measurement of energy at time t_1 outside a region of space with a measuring apparatus at some other region (x_1,y_1,z_1). Using some geometry it can be shown I choose t_1 > t_0 + r'/c such that:

c^2(t_1 - t_0 - r'/c)^2 -(x_1 - x_0)^2 - (y_1 - y_0)^2 - (z_1 - z_0)^2 < 0

Hence, they are space-like separated. This means I could have one observer who first sees me turn on the potential H_{int} and measure a bump in energy \langle \Delta E \rangle but I could also have an observer who sees me first measure energy and then turn on the interaction potential.

Obviously the second observer will observe something different.

Question
---
How does relativistic quantum mechanics deal with this paradox?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It deals with it by using QFT. A 1st-quantization formalism is doomed to fail, precisely because of the causality considerations you just observed!
 
vanhees71 said:
It deals with it by using QFT. A 1st-quantization formalism is doomed to fail, precisely because of the causality considerations you just observed!

Can I have a reference for this? I've skimmed through a book of RQM (https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540674573) which makes not mention of this :/
 
It's because it's a book about "relativistic quantum mechanics". A nice heuristic argument is given in the beginning of the well-known textbook by Peskin and Schroeder (though in general I'd rather recommend Schwartz as a relativistic QFT intro book).
 
vanhees71 said:
It's because it's a book about "relativistic quantum mechanics". A nice heuristic argument is given in the beginning of the well-known textbook by Peskin and Schroeder (though in general I'd rather recommend Schwartz as a relativistic QFT intro book).

I'll have a look.

In a similar spirit to page 21 I can modify the last inequality by stating the time taken for the sudden approximation to be valid is

\tau = t_{1/2} - t_0 >> \frac{\hbar}{\langle \Delta E \rangle}

The time after the sudden approximation is measured is given by \Delta t_1 = t_1 - t_{1/2} then:c^2 (\Delta t_1 - \frac{\hbar}{ \langle \Delta E \rangle} - r'/c)^2 < (x_1 - x_0)^2 + (y_1 - y_0)^2 + (z_1 -z_0)^2

I haven't seen this expression before as a breakdown condition for QM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K