Bug "Thread Closed" status not indicated in Alerts list

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the lack of indication for closed threads in the Alerts list, leading to confusion for users who may not realize a thread is closed until they notice the absence of a reply link. While closed threads contribute to the forum's archived knowledge base, their status is not immediately obvious to users, especially those not logged in. The view count for these threads continues to grow, indicating ongoing interest despite their closure. The conversation touches on the differences in thread management practices across forums, with some keeping threads open indefinitely. The issue is framed as an observation rather than strictly a bug or suggestion, prompting further inquiry to the administrator.
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,586
Reaction score
2,031
We have the system of Alerts and the tool to open that list, and visit any post or topic in the Alerts list. Sometimes a thread or topic for a listing in the Alerts list is CLOSED; but the item in the Alerts list shows no indication that the 'thread is closed'. Only if we are signed in and are sharp enough would we find that upon visiting one of our Alert items, that none of the posts have a 'reply' link, and that we may intelligently guess that the thread or topic is now closed. And then the last post of the topic will show the moderator posted for whatever reason that "thread is closed".

Eventually, most if not all members visiting that topic will find that it is closed, but it may not appear immediately obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eventually, all threads get closed. Look at threads from 10 or more years in the past, they are all closed. It is part of our archived knowledge base.

Those old threads still have value. People find them by google searching for phrases. They don't need to be PF members. A person can get there by search, read and learn from the thread, and never notice how old the thread it. To him, the age is irrelevant. It is also irrelevant if the thread is closed if he just wants to learn by reading, not posting. If the person is not registered on PF, he can't post anyhow.

One thing you do see on the alert list is the view count. That count continues to grow year by year. Sometimes, the number of views after the last post far exceed the views during the time the thread was active.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby and dlgoff
anorlunda said:
Look at threads from 10 or more years in the past, they are all closed. It is part of our archived knowledge base.
I was on another board where they keep threads open forever and don't allow new threads on the same topics (and merge any that were). You had to be a bit careful answering the early posts because some members have died.
 
StevieTNZ said:
Rt Hon @Greg Bernhardt - is this a bug or a suggestion?
You asking the administrator? I am who asked about this topic. I chose "bug", but am not insisting on the topic being a suggestion. It is more an OBSERVATION, and allows for some explanation.
 
symbolipoint said:
You asking the administrator?
Yes.
 
I have some solemn news to report. Many in the community had been wondering where the prolific @Vanadium 50 has been. V50 hasn't posted a message in nearly a year. After months of questioning, the mentor group dug in and did some investigation and we're confident V50 passed away early this year. Few members need reminding what kind of force @Vanadium 50 was for the community and physics. A mentor for 5+ years and an annual award winner seemingly every other year. He has a top 10 post count...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K