Three-Dimensional Virial Theorem (Quantum Mechanics)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 11K views
NeoDevin
Messages
334
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


(a) Prove the three-dimensional virial theorem:

[tex]2<t> = <r\cdot \nabla V>[/tex]

(for stationary states)

Homework Equations



Eq. 3.71 (not sure if this applies to 3 dimensions, but I think so)

\frac{d}{dt}<Q> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<[\hat H, \hat Q]> + \left<\frac{\partial \hat Q}{\partial t}\left> [/tex]

where the last term is the explicit time dependence of the operator Q.

The Attempt at a Solution



Letting [itex]Q = \vec r \cdot \vec p[/itex]

[tex]\frac{\partial \hat Q}{\partial t} = 0[/tex]

and for stationary states:

[tex]\frac{d}{dt}<Q> = 0[/tex]

so:

[tex]0 = \frac{i}{\hbar}<[\hat H, \hat Q]> = \frac{i}{\hbar}<[T+V, \vec r \cdot \vec p]>[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{i}{\hbar}(<T(\vec r \cdot \vec p)>-<\vec r \cdot \vec p T> + <V(\vec r \cdot \vec p)> - <\vec r \cdot \vec p V>)[/tex]

but

[tex]<\vec r \cdot \vec p V> = <\vec r \cdot (\vec pV)> + <V(\vec r \cdot \vec p)>[/tex]

so

[tex]0 = \frac{i}{\hbar}(<T(\vec r \cdot \vec p)> - <\vec r \cdot \vec p T> - <\vec r \cdot (\vec p V)>)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First you show that
$$\begin{align}\frac{d\langle \mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{p}\rangle}{dt}=-\frac{i}{\hbar}\sum_{j=1}^3\left(\langle x_j[p_j,H]+[x_j,H]p_j\rangle \right).\end{align}$$
Second you show that $$\begin{align}[p_j,H]=+\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial V}{\partial x_j}~~\text{and}~~[x_j,H]=-\frac{p_j}{m}.\end{align}$$
Third you substitute equations (2) into (1) and it should pop out.