Time: A Scientific Exploration

  • Thread starter Thread starter elosin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the concept of time, exploring its nature as a dimension of space and its relationship with gravity and velocity. Participants discuss how time is perceived differently by observers, particularly in contexts involving high speeds, such as near the speed of light, and the implications of gravitational time dilation on GPS technology. The conversation also touches on philosophical questions regarding the existence of time before the Big Bang and the concept of a "Block Universe," as proposed by physicists like Kurt Gödel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with gravitational time dilation
  • Basic knowledge of the Big Bang theory
  • Concept of the Block Universe in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research gravitational time dilation and its effects on GPS systems
  • Explore the implications of the Block Universe theory in modern physics
  • Study the relationship between time and velocity in special relativity
  • Investigate philosophical interpretations of time and existence before the Big Bang
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of time and its implications in the universe.

  • #91
elosin said:
Whao, all of this are new information. thanks they help a lot=D
But one more question, if time is (space ,other dimensions that things travel to one direction.), What is before time? If time is what is mention, anything that happen before that should not even happen. Hence if that did not happen how does time even start?

Since time is an evolution parameter, as said above. Asking «what is before y?» is like asking for some x(t) given y(t') where t<t'. Your question «What is before time?» is like asking for some x(t) given t where t<t, which makes no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Hello all,

I would agree that dx/dy does not require time since the infinite number of possible ratios are all contained at ounce in this simple equation.

For me, Time is very real and is defined as the infinite realm in which space exists... it is the space of space and their common existence is spacetime.

In spacetime, Time enables fundamental energetic processes to evolve in space, interacting and becoming each and every structures we have so far named and included in the comprehension we developped of our magnificent Universe.

Our best (and current) comprehension culminates in Science and, since the beginning of its endeavour, Science uses Time in a quantitative manner providing a measure of duration that is usable in itself or in a relative way.

The actual quantization of Time is a product of basic arithmetics; 1 + 1 + 1... the accuracy to which it is measured depends on our current mastery of how fast we can resolve this basic repetitive addition.

For the human mind, Time remains a representation of duration, perceived in a mental creation stemming from both our environment, which itself is in a vast array of relative motion, and our knowledge of that basic arithmetic operation.


regards,

VE
 
  • #93
It's the thing that keeps everything from happening all at once.
 
  • #94
It's not a dimension per say. It's an unconstant constant constant.
 
  • #95
The OP's second post had an interesting question. When the universe was the size of a pin-head (or smaller), before expansion, shouldn't 'time' be frozen due to gravitational time dilation?
 
  • #96
Previous thread on this very issue has either been deleted or locked, due to several violations of the PF Rules, especially on speculative posts.

It looks like this thread will suffer the SAME fate. We have given it ample opportunity for people to discuss this on the basis of valid physics. However, it has now meander into personal opinions, speculation, and philosophy. That signifies the end of this thread.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K