Time required to fill a vacuum tank with water?

In summary, the vacuum pump creates a 90% vacuum inside the tank, which sucks in water. It will take 6 minutes for the tank to be filled, given that the pump is kept on.
  • #1
siddharth23
249
26
I have a 6500 litre or 6.5 m^3 tank.

A vacuum pump (40000 litres per minute) creates a 90 % vacuum inside the tank.

The vacuum is used to suck in water. The climb the water has to make is 6m.

How much time will it take to fill the tank, given that the pump is kept on all the while?

Thanks in advance!
Siddharth
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the pump did not keep operating, what would happen?
 
  • #3
How does water enter your tank? That will influence the filling rate significantly (imagine a 1mm pipe compared to a 10cm pipe...)
 
  • #4
It's a 4 inch pipe. I used Bernoulli's equation. That would be applicable here, right?
 
  • #5
Simon Bridge said:
If the pump did not keep operating, what would happen?

I guess as the water would fill up the tank, the air would get less place leading to compression and the vacuum force would go on decreasing.
 
  • #6
siddharth23 said:
I guess as the water would fill up the tank, the air would get less place leading to compression and the vacuum force would go on decreasing.
That's right, but you have to compare the inflow of water with the pump capability.

As a first approximation, the velocity of the water will be of the order of 5m/s or less, this gives ~2500l/min. Your pump is way more powerful than the pipe leading to the tank.

0.67m^3/s... looks really over-sized for such a small tank.
 
  • #7
Simon_Bridge said:
If the pump did not keep operating, what would happen?
siddharth23 said:
I guess as the water would fill up the tank, the air would get less place leading to compression and the vacuum force would go on decreasing.
... yes - under what conditions would the flow come to a stop?

I'm not sure it is helping you to think of the tank as containing a vacuum or the vacuum exerting a force - think of it as containing air at very low pressure. It's like the experiment you did as a kid where you light a candle in a dish of water and put a jar over it.

mfb said:
That's right, but you have to compare the inflow of water with the pump capability.
... i.e. since there is a pump: what difference does that make?
... will the air pressure at the top of the inrushing water remain the same, increase, or decrease, as a result of the action of the pump?

mfb has discussed this a bit:
As a first approximation, the velocity of the water will be of the order of 5m/s or less, this gives ~2500l/min. Your pump is way more powerful than the pipe leading to the tank.

0.67m^3/s... looks really over-sized for such a small tank.
... I suspect the person setting the problem is trying to make sure the math is simple-ish.
 
  • #8
... I suspect the person setting the problem is trying to make sure the math is simple-ish.[/QUOTE]

This is being actually used by the company where I'm interning. They've been doing it by trial and error till date and are doing a decent job.

Simon - Nah I didn't literally mean vacuum force. I got what you meant. What I meant was as the vacuum would decrease, the negetive pressure head will decrease and the depth from which water can be sucked up will be affected.


Just tell me, Bernoulli's equation can be applied here, right?
 
  • #9
http://www.princeton.edu/~asmits/Bicycle_web/Bernoulli.html
Sounds good to me - provided the pressure difference is maintained: should put you in the right ballpark at least. Check it by using a known result.

Yep - the water would be drawn into the tank until the pressure difference balances the weight of water.
The pump stops this from happening - if you didn't shut it off, it looks like you'd be pumping water instead of air at some point.
 
  • #10
The vacuum pump is actually a compressor, so there's no worry of water being pumped out.
 
  • #11
Well it's besides the point.
 
  • #12
I mean it won't pump out water.

Anyways, thanks everyone :)
 
  • #13
No worries - have fun :)
 

1. How long does it take to fill a vacuum tank with water?

The time required to fill a vacuum tank with water depends on the size and shape of the tank, the pressure of the vacuum, and the flow rate of the water. It can range from a few seconds to several minutes.

2. Does the temperature of the water affect the filling time?

Yes, the temperature of the water can affect the filling time of a vacuum tank. Warmer water has a lower viscosity and can flow faster, resulting in a shorter filling time compared to colder water.

3. What is the ideal flow rate for filling a vacuum tank with water?

The ideal flow rate for filling a vacuum tank with water depends on the size and shape of the tank, as well as the pressure of the vacuum. It is important to balance the flow rate with the vacuum pressure to ensure efficient filling without causing damage to the tank.

4. Can the shape of the vacuum tank affect the filling time?

Yes, the shape of the vacuum tank can affect the filling time. A tank with a larger surface area will take longer to fill compared to a tank with a smaller surface area, assuming all other factors are constant. This is because a larger surface area means more water needs to be pushed into the tank to reach the desired level.

5. How can the filling time of a vacuum tank be reduced?

The filling time of a vacuum tank can be reduced by increasing the flow rate of the water, using warmer water, and optimizing the shape and size of the tank. Additionally, using a more powerful vacuum or creating a stronger pressure differential between the inside and outside of the tank can also decrease filling time.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
721
Replies
4
Views
295
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
413
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
5
Views
834
Back
Top