Time Travel to Future: Is There a Minimum Speed?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of minimum speed in relation to time travel, specifically questioning whether a speed of zero is achievable and what implications it has for time. Participants assert that all motion is relative, emphasizing that there is no absolute state of motion. The concept of traveling faster than light, referenced through the "tachyonic antitelephone," is highlighted as a theoretical means of moving backward in time. Ultimately, the conversation concludes that time travel into the future occurs continuously, regardless of gravitational influence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativity and motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of gravitational fields
  • Knowledge of theoretical physics, particularly time travel theories
  • Basic comprehension of tachyons and their implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the "tachyonic antitelephone" in theoretical physics
  • Study Einstein's theory of relativity and its impact on the understanding of motion
  • Explore the concept of spacetime as presented in Taylor and Wheeler's "Spacetime Physics"
  • Investigate the effects of gravity on time perception and travel
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the complexities of time travel and the nature of motion in the universe.

Dakota
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Theoretically you can travel back in time by moving faster than the speed of light, or the universal speed limit. Is there a minimum speed? 0. But with gravity you would be moving, so if you move against gravity relative to yourself you are moving. So if there was a place in the universe free of a gravitational pull or the gravitational pull was the same from all sides you would be moving at a true 0. So my question is; can you stop moving and if so is that the minimum speed, and if it is what would time do? would it take you to the future?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dakota said:
Theoretically you can travel back in time by moving faster than the speed of light, or the universal speed limit. Is there a minimum speed? 0. But with gravity you would be moving, so if you move against gravity relative to yourself you are moving. So if there was a place in the universe free of a gravitational pull or the gravitational pull was the same from all sides you would be moving at a true 0. So my question is; can you stop moving and if so is that the minimum speed, and if it is what would time do? would it take you to the future?
You seem to believe that there is such a thing as absolute motion. There is absolute acceleration, but other than that, all motion is relative so "moving at 0" is not a meaningful concept except in relation to some other object.
 
Dakota said:
Theoretically you can travel back in time by moving faster than the speed of light, or the universal speed limit.
Kinda sorta... Google for "tachyonic antitelephone" to see how faster-than-light travel can be described as going backwards in time. (If you find the description of the anti-telephone complicated or confusing, or if any of the math is even slightly unclear... That will be a hint that you should spend some time with a good basic textbook - I recommend Taylor and Wheeler's "Spacetime Physics").

Is there a minimum speed? 0. But with gravity you would be moving, so if you move against gravity relative to yourself you are moving. So if there was a place in the universe free of a gravitational pull or the gravitational pull was the same from all sides you would be moving at a true 0. So my question is; can you stop moving and if so is that the minimum speed, and if it is what would time do? would it take you to the future?
The quick answer is that of course you travel into the future, whether in a gravitational field or not - I'm doing it right now, traveling into the future at a rate of one second every second.

However, you have a more serious misunderstanding here. All speeds are relative; it never makes sense to say that something is moving without saying what it is moving relative to. Thus, there cannot be anything special about speed zero - it just means that whatever we're talking about is not moving relative to its immediate surroundings. I'm sitting in a comfortable chair right now. Am I moving? Not according to someone in the same room watching me... But I'm moving at several kilometers a second relative to a Martian astronomer resting comfortably in his chair on Mars and watching me through a telescope. You have to really seriously wrap your mind around this notion that all motion is relative, that there is no moving and not moving, before you will be able to understand relativity.

As this thread is based on a number of misunderstandings, it is closed and will remain closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo, Chestermiller and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
941
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K