Top 10 Worst Cities for Speed Traps

  • Thread starter Thread starter mugaliens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the experiences and opinions of participants regarding speed traps in various cities, particularly those listed as the worst for such enforcement. Participants share personal anecdotes about receiving tickets, the nature of speed enforcement, and the implications of speed limits.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Personal anecdotes

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share their experiences with speed traps in cities like Houston, Dallas, and Colorado Springs, noting the frequency of tickets and warnings received.
  • One participant questions the legitimacy of ticketing for speeds just 1-4 mph over the limit, suggesting that speed cameras may not be accurate enough for such precision.
  • Another participant discusses the enforcement practices in the UK, contrasting them with those in the US and expressing frustration over perceived unfair speed limits.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of red light cameras in Tucson, with one participant describing them as a scam due to their operation and the fines associated with them.
  • Some participants reflect on the subjective nature of speed limits and the enforcement of laws, with differing opinions on whether speed traps serve to uphold the law or merely generate revenue.
  • There are mentions of personal experiences with being pulled over for speeding, including a participant's account of being ticketed while driving with others at the same speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on speed traps, with some agreeing on the frustrations of enforcement practices while others defend the legality of speed limits and the necessity of speed traps. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding speed enforcement, including the accuracy of speed cameras and the fairness of speed limits, which are not universally accepted. There are also references to regional differences in enforcement practices.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals concerned about traffic enforcement, those who have received speeding tickets, or anyone interested in the implications of speed limits and traffic laws in different regions.

Have you been ticketed in any of these ten worst speed trap cities?

  • None of them.

    Votes: 4 50.0%

  • Between 1 and 3 of them.

    Votes: 4 50.0%

  • More than 4 of them.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
mugaliens
Messages
197
Reaction score
1
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1728/americas-worst-speed-traps/".

Has anyone lived in these ten cities? I've spent 16 years, total, in 3 different ones!

LA, CA
Chicago, IL
Dallas, TX
Orlando, FL
Denver, CO
Jacksonville, FL
Colorado Springs, CO
Las Vegas, NV
Austin, TX
Houson, TX

Interestingly, I've driven in 8 of them, but have received only a single ticket in just one of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I live in the Houston metro area. I have received a few tickets (it's been something like 7-8 years since getting one), but gotten many warnings. I have received a ticket on the way from Houston to Dallas, and been riding with people who received a ticket or warning just south of Dallas, coming from Houston.

All I can say is "trap" or not, I was indeed speeding in every instance except for one. It happened about 1.5 hours outside of Houston. I won't give the details, but it was a very poor showing from the DPS (that particular pair of officers at least).

Edit- Although I mostly had speeding forced out of me by being pulled over quite frequently, a lot of extra attention from the police was due to driving various V8 camaros from age 16-23ish. I don't speed much anymore, but there are some things I enjoy about driving an inconspicuous Olds 88 or Nissan Murano most of the time.
 
Last edited:
Although I may not agree with individual speed limits, I find it amazing how many people complain about speed traps (re the article).

Are they the worst cities for speed traps or the best for upholding the law?

Every person who gets caught speeding deserves it and as far as I'm concerned don't have a leg to stand on.

The UK has a similar list of 'hot spots'. People constantly complain about them simply being a way of making money and that they don't reduce accidents. They ignore the fact they were breaking the law.

If you think some of these are bad and cops pulling you over is a nightmare, the UK is moving away from cops being on the road for speeders and using average speed cameras. There's a stretch for about 10 miles on my journey home that they take your numberplate every half mile or so and compare the time you took to the time it should take (maximum).
Now they are a nightmare. (Only on motorways, so my distaste comes from what I consider bad speed limits. I'm the only one on the road at 12pm and yet I have to do 50mph - 20mph below the national speed limit.) Not so much a 'hot spot' as 'hot stretch'.
 
Some of these districts claim to ticket for between 1-4mph over the limit. How is that possible: surely speed cameras aren't accurate enough for that?
 
cristo said:
Some of these districts claim to ticket for between 1-4mph over the limit. How is that possible: surely speed cameras aren't accurate enough for that?

Didn't think they could legally. The UK cameras have to be +10% and some to ensure you're definitely speeding (no clock error etc).

An example is whenever you see the TV stuff they show them set to ~58 for a 50mph area.
 
In 2009, I got my first speeding ticket in 30 years in CSprings. I was going over 55 in a 45, so I can't say they were being overly picky. It's just an annoying speed limit in that, instead of setting the limit to 45 just for the winding part of the road, they set a 45 mph limit for the entire stretch of road, most of which 55 is a safe speed.
 
mugaliens said:
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1728/americas-worst-speed-traps/".

Has anyone lived in these ten cities? I've spent 16 years, total, in 3 different ones!

LA, CA
Chicago, IL
Dallas, TX
Orlando, FL
Denver, CO
Jacksonville, FL
Colorado Springs, CO
Las Vegas, NV
Austin, TX
Houston, TX

Interestingly, I've driven in 8 of them, but have received only a single ticket in just one of them.
LV is the only one where I haven't driven. I haven't received tickets in any of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you want an expensive speeding ticket? Just drive the Mass Pike from NY into Mass with out-of-state plates near the end of the month or any other time when the troopers are being pressed to meet their quotas for fines.

I was pulled over and ticketed in a speed-trap (cop with radar hiding under an overpass) for simply going the same speed as everybody else, and in the right-hand lane (no passing). They had at least a dozen cars pulled over, with troopers going from one to another, passing out tickets. Not a single one of the vehicles had Mass plates, on the theory that people would send in the fine rather than drive all the way back there for a court date.

When I told the trooper that it was pretty slimy pulling people out of an orderly flow of traffic to hand out citations, he grinned and said "Well, we can't catch EVERYBODY." Indeed not.
 
turbo-1 said:
I was pulled over and ticketed in a speed-trap (cop with radar hiding under an overpass) for simply going the same speed as everybody else, and in the right-hand lane (no passing).

Unfortunately the "same speed as everyone else" defence doesn't hold up!
 
  • #10
The speed cameras in the Tucson area are very generous. They give a person 10 MPH over the limit before the camera will flash.

On the other hand the red light cameras within the city limits are a total scam. The cameras are operated by a private company, and they know how to make big bucks.

I say scam because the cameras are aimed at people turning left with the green arrow. Our left turn arrows come on at the end of the through traffic cycle. This means that all red lights are already on.

Essentially no red light comes on in front of the driver turning left. They are already on. A yellow light goes out. There is a point where a driver can no longer see the yellow light, yet they are not yet legally in the intersection. That is where thousands of people, yes thousands, are being flashed by the cameras.

One of my big objections against nailing people by 1/10 of a second is that the person turning left with the arrow can not cause an accident. At the end of the left on green arrow cycle the lights stay red in all four directions to allow traffic to clear.

Citations are sent out in the mail.

There are only cameras at intersection that have at least two left turn lanes. The fine is $387 plus the driver must pay another $200 to attend a mandatory safety class.

My wife recently was cited at a notorious intersection near our home. I say notorious because the instructors at the driving school openly referred to that intersection as the killing fields.

The killing fields term is in no way related to accidents. It is related to the number of cititations issued to drivers making the left on green arrow
 
Last edited:
  • #11
edward said:
There is a point where a driver can no longer see the yellow light, yet they are not yet legally in the intersection.

What do you mean by "can no longer see"? Do you mean that the yellow light has gone out? In which case, the light is red and the driver should not enter the intersection. Formally, the driver should also not be entering the intersection on a yellow turn signal anyway (yellow/amber lights mean stop).
 
  • #12
cristo said:
Some of these districts claim to ticket for between 1-4mph over the limit. How is that possible: surely speed cameras aren't accurate enough for that?

It woiuld be easy enough to make a speed camera using the doppler effect accurate to 1%, or even 0.1%.

The reason for the larger margin of error is because the speed displays in vehicles are not very accurate, and drivers usually have other tasks to attend to except monitoring their speed (though for some drivers, those tasks don't seem to include "looking out of the window"...)
 
  • #13
I've only ever had one speeding ticket, about 25 years ago shortly after I moved to South Carolina. I was driving home from an evening in Columbia via the "back road" (actually a US-numbered highway) that parallels the Interstate, and passed though the outskirts of a small city along the way, as I had done (and have done since) many times. Along that stretch of road, the speed limit is 45 mph, and I was going 50. That night, the local cops put up a temporary 35 mph sign in a spot where there had been none before, and nabbed me for going 15 over the limit.

When I went to my bank a few days later to get a money order to pay the fine (they didn't take personal checks), and the teller saw who I wanted it made out to, she looked up at me and said, "They got you too, huh?"
 
  • #14
cristo said:
What do you mean by "can no longer see"? Do you mean that the yellow light has gone out? In which case, the light is red and the driver should not enter the intersection. Formally, the driver should also not be entering the intersection on a yellow turn signal anyway (yellow/amber lights mean stop).

They are in fact beyond the point where they can see the yellow.

The official legal entry point to many of our intersections is well out from the crosswalk. At this particular intersection it is 24 feet beyond the cross walk on one side and 18 feet on the other.

Most people who are already on the crosswalk when the yellow comes on tend to go on through because for many years that was what we were taught. DON"T BLOCK THE CROSSWALK.

When the yellow comes on people are in what is called the dilemma zone. They must decide whether to stop or proceed safely through the intersection. Engineering studies show that the average person needs one full second to make that determination.

The yellow duration on the left turn cycle is only on for 2 1/2 seconds.
 
  • #15
Here is one of the intersections in question. That white line out from the crosswalk is the legal entry point into the intersection.

nexb80.jpg
 
  • #16
The Los Angeles entry is a load of *censored*. Emphasis mine:

10. Los Angeles, California

Speed traps: 151

Los Angeles is a great example of speed limits not matching at all what traffic patterns indicate is a safe speed—which is how they're supposed to be determined.

Most of the speed traps are on the boulevards in the valley, my L.A.-based colleague Jane Wells, who writes the Funny Business blog, says. "The speed limit is 35 but if you actually drove that, you'd get mowed down!" Wells says.

Fines and surcharges for speeding or failing to have proof of insurance can approach $1,400, the NMA reports. And good luck fighting a ticket in L.A. It's always been tough, but with the city teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, motorists don't have a chance.

"If you walk into a courtroom, because of the massive deficits at every level, they can't let a breathing person walk out without taking their money!" Dornsife said.


The "valley" is NOT Los Angeles. It is Burbank, Studio City, Van Nuys, etc. Those are different cities. It takes a good half an hour to get to the "valley" from Los Angeles.

Second, it is impossible to drive the speed limit in LA proper, let alone exceed it, because there are far too many cars. I have lived here 3 years and never heard of anyone getting a speeding ticket.

I think the cash cow in LA is parking tickets.
 
  • #17
cristo said:
Some of these districts claim to ticket for between 1-4mph over the limit. How is that possible: surely speed cameras aren't accurate enough for that?
We don't use cameras like the UK. These are actual police officers using radar behind the car.
 
  • #18
Evo said:
We don't use cameras like the UK. These are actual police officers using radar behind the car.
Actually, there are cameras and radar guns on the same poles that the traffic lights are mounted on.

There are "informational" displays on portable signs that say things like "your speed is 41 mph" "too fast", or similar. Other arrays can clock you, identify you, and generate an automatic fine, though this has not been a big problem locally. I understand that the intersection cameras are big money-makers, since they are more used for evidence for time-stamped moving violations, with no reference to speed, and it's hard to fight fines for an illegal turn or a late passage through an intersection when there is digital coverage of the whole thing.
 
  • #19
edward said:
Most people who are already on the crosswalk when the yellow comes on tend to go on through because for many years that was what we were taught. DON"T BLOCK THE CROSSWALK.

When the yellow comes on people are in what is called the dilemma zone. They must decide whether to stop or proceed safely through the intersection. Engineering studies show that the average person needs one full second to make that determination.

The yellow duration on the left turn cycle is only on for 2 1/2 seconds.

I'm not defending the ticketing, but technically, you should only get onto the crosswalk when you are sure that you can proceed into the intersection, and not blindly follow the bumper in front of you.

You could make the yellow last 20 seconds, and people would still complain about it.
 
  • #20
turbo-1 said:
Actually, there are cameras and radar guns on the same poles that the traffic lights are mounted on.

There are "informational" displays on portable signs that say things like "your speed is 41 mph" "too fast", or similar. Other arrays can clock you, identify you, and generate an automatic fine, though this has not been a big problem locally. I understand that the intersection cameras are big money-makers, since they are more used for evidence for time-stamped moving violations, with no reference to speed, and it's hard to fight fines for an illegal turn or a late passage through an intersection when there is digital coverage of the whole thing.
But we don't have the universal traffic ticketing system they have in the UK. Most tickets in the US are still given out by police officers, not so in the UK.
 
  • #21
Evo said:
But we don't have the universal traffic ticketing system they have in the UK. Most tickets in the US are still given out by police officers, not so in the UK.
That is not the case when dealing with stop-light cameras (as they are often called). Often, they are run by private contractors, and they generate tons of money by automatically ticketing "offenders" that fall into the trap.

For example, in Maine, you are allowed to creep past the Stop line after stopping, in preparation for making a turn or crossing an intersection. When the light-cycle is through, you are allowed to make your left-turn or cross the intersection even when you light is red.

Start playing around with technicalities and interpretation of current law, and there is no end to the mischief that private "traffic monitoring" firms can cause.
 
  • #22
cristo said:
Unfortunately the "same speed as everyone else" defence doesn't hold up!

Neither does the "but they were all going faster than I was!" defense, even if it's true. The LEO's response to that one was, "That's why I stopped you."

You know, I think they've heard 'em all before, so they get very good with their snappy comebacks.
 
  • #23
Evo said:
I thought you said before that you drive recklessly and break the speed limit all of the time, but that you get out of tickets because you have a "disabled veteran" license plate.

Whatever nightmares grieve you, Evo, they're of someone else.

I am an honorably-retired veteran. I am not, nor have I ever been disabled, and your dimunuitive comments concerning veterans in general is HIGHLY offensive, if not blatently disgusting, to ALL who have served our country both here and abroad, whether PD, FD, community leadership, state department, or the military.
 
  • #24
mugaliens said:
Whatever nightmares grieve you, Evo, they're of someone else.
She is just thinking of another user (bolding mine):
airborne18 said:
today I got my state Disabled Veteran Tag. Not for vanity reasons, though a lot of veterans get various veterans tags for that purpose. I have nothing against it.

But the DAV tag and a few others have a very special purpose, and why they have very strict requirements.

I call it the "Thank you for your service" benefit. Police will not cite you for traffic violations. They will stop you and give you a warning, then hand you back your license and say "Thank you for your service".

In the odd case I get a ticket, I just call the Attorney Generals office and they won't prosecute.
My wife has never gotten a ticket.. the woman thing. No I don't either. Ha.

Although he didn't say he was driving recklessly.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
mugaliens said:
your dimunuitive comments concerning veterans in general is HIGHLY offensive, if not blatently disgusting, to ALL who have served our country both here and abroad, whether PD, FD, community leadership, state department, or the military.

Error aside, you can call it offensive all you like but what stood out in that thread is that disabled veterans either think they should be let off or that they can be and it's not particularly wrong.

Personally I find it disgusting that anyone is treated in such a way. When you break the law you are no different to anyone else who does so. I don't care whether you're PD, FD or veteran, you should be held responsible.

I'm sorry, but as much respect as I have for these people there is only so far you can ride the "veteran" bandwaggon.

If you disagree with this (and perhaps feel they should be allowed to break the law), then that's up to you.
 
  • #26
caffenta said:
Although he didn't say he was driving recklessly.

Being pulled over for drunk driving, speeding etc is driving recklessly. I know a few people mentioned it and the implications of having the badge (getting away with doing those things).

I can't remember how many said they had experienced it or simply knew of it.
 
  • #27
caffenta said:
She is just thinking of another user (bolding mine):
Thanks for finding that caffenta, yes I got mugs and Airborne confused.

My sincerest apologies MUGS, I didn't realize there were two members that discuss being retired military. And no, I support servicemen, I don't make diminuitive remarks about them, so I guess you have me confused with someone else. I'm an ex military spouse and all of the men in my family served, but that's all explained in another thread.

My father was blinded in WWII when he was hit in the face with shrapnel, my briother served in Germany, my first husband was in Naval Intelligence during the Vietnam War and my grandfather was a captain in the French Navy serving in WWII in North Africa.
 
Last edited:
  • #28
caffenta said:
I'm not defending the ticketing, but technically, you should only get onto the crosswalk when you are sure that you can proceed into the intersection, and not blindly follow the bumper in front of you.

You could make the yellow last 20 seconds, and people would still complain about it.

You are right about the duration of the yellow. Someone is always on the end of the cycle.

I was trying to explain that the average person needs one full second to decide what they need to do. That just leaves 1 1/2 seconds for them to actually do it. The short yellow isn't the problem. It only adds to the overall situation in a negative manner.

As I mentioned due to the unusual configuration of some intersections a vehicle can already be on the crosswalk when the light turns yellow ands still be cited.

There are only red light cameras at intersections that have this type of configuration. Did you notice that I mentioned that the cameras are pointed directly at the left turn lanes?

Look at the aerial view I included. Local traffic engineers are disgusted with the situation, but the City Council calls the shots.

The company that operates the still cameras also has a continuous video running. Ironically the video can be the best defence against the citation. It requires a person to download a DivX player to view the video clip.

The video can be advanced one frame at a time and frozen. When I did it with my daughter in laws citation I got this:

o8x8pi.jpg


The print screen function will not work with the DivX Player so I had to take use my camera to take a picture of my monitor.

She took the above picture to court and the judge dismissed the citation. Not many people are able to defend themselves in this manner.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
I've never had a speeding ticket. It's not hard to avoid getting speeding tickets. You can go a little bit over the speed limit, but some people drive seemingly oblivious to speed limits. The more speed traps the better. I'm just fed up with bad drivers who drive like they want to wreck.
 
  • #30
jarednjames said:
When you break the law you are no different to anyone else who does so. I don't care whether you're PD, FD or veteran, you should be held responsible.

I agree 100%, Jared. I was peeved by the errant way these fine folks were portrayed as somehow being "above the law."

That is false.

Evo said:
Thanks for finding that caffenta, yes I got mugs and Airborne confused.

My sincerest apologies MUGS, I didn't realize there were two members that discuss being retired military.

Apology accepted, Evo, and thank you for being up front about it. There are actually a signficant number of active duty, retired, and former military, here on PF. :)