Topology: Finding the set of limit points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the set of limit points for the set A = { \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} | m,n \in Z_{+} }. Participants explore the properties of limit points and question the boundaries of the set, particularly focusing on the interval (0,1) and the inclusion of 0 as a limit point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether points in the interval (0,1) can be limit points and discuss the definition of limit points. There are attempts to clarify the conditions under which certain points, like 3/4 and 1/2, are considered limit points. The idea that limit points may take the form of 1/v is also raised, alongside discussions about the implications of including 0 as a limit point.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of limit points, and there is an ongoing exploration of the characteristics of the set A and its limit points. Multiple interpretations are being examined, particularly concerning the inclusion of 0.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of limit points, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of their assumptions. The discussion reflects a mix of correct and incorrect reasoning regarding the set's boundaries and the nature of limit points.

Damascus Road
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Determine the set of limit points of:

A = { \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} \in R | m,n \in Z_{+} }


I can see that everything less than one can't be reached by this set.
Is my set of limit points (0,1) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If x is in <0, 1>, can x be a limit point of this set? What's the definition of a limit point?
 
Damascus Road said:
Determine the set of limit points of:

A = { \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} \in R | m,n \in Z_{+} }

I can see that everything less than one can't be reached by this set.
Is my set of limit points (0,1) ?
Perhaps you meant to say: Not everything less than one can be reached by this set.

Not sure what you mean by "reach".

From Wolfram Math World:
Limit Point: A number x is a limit point of a set if for all ε>0, there exists a member y of the set different from x such that |y-x|<ε.​

The rational number 3/4 ∈ A, (n=2, m=4), but is 3/4 a limit point of A? Why not?

on the other hand 1/2 is a limit point of A.
 
Damascus Road said:
Determine the set of limit points of:

A = { \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n} \in R | m,n \in Z_{+} }


I can see that everything less than one can't be reached by this set.
Is my set of limit points (0,1) ?

Hmm, I think you mean that everything more than one can't be reached by this set. For example, 3/2 is not a limit point of of this set, though it is in the set (take m = 1, n = 2). If that is what you meant, then yes, no points above 1 are limit points of this set.


However, the interval (0,1) is not the answer, either. For example, take any x in (0,1) that is not in A. Then there will always be a neighborhood of x that contains no points of A. Now, let x be a fixed 1/n, in any neighborhood of 1/n, there is always a point of A (different from 1/n); think about why this is. So, right now, I am saying the the points 1/n are all limit points of A. But there is one more than that. Do you know what it is?
 
Hm, ok. I can see how I was thinking about this the wrong way.

It seems as though the limit points may be of the form 1/v, where v is a positive integer..
 
Yes, points of the form 1/v are limit points, but that is no all of them. There is exactly one more.
 
and the empty set!
 
Nope. It is a number.
 
Wait, what?
We can't approximate the empty set with that set... So it's a limit point, isn't it?
 
  • #10
Damascus Road said:
Wait, what?
We can't approximate the empty set with that set... So it's a limit point, isn't it?

A limit point, p, of a set, S, is a point such that every neighborhood of that p contains a point of S different from p. The empty set is not a point. To get the missing limit point, go along with your 1/v idea and think about a REALLY big v.
 
  • #11
1/ really big v = zero.. ?
 
  • #12
yep, 0 is a limit point of A.
 
  • #13
lol, doh. My brain was thinking zero, and my fingers typed empty set.

I'm going to go teach them a lesson, thanks very much!
I'll probably end up posting with other questions from this assignment :P
 
  • #14
I'm pretty sure that 0 is NOT a limit point of A because 0 ∉ A.
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
I'm pretty sure that 0 is NOT a limit point of A because 0 ∉ A.

A limit point does not have to be in the set of which it is a limit point.

For example, consider the set A={1/n:n\in N} then 0 is a limit point because every neighborhood of 0 has a point from A. Thus, 0 is a limit point.
 
  • #16
I stand corrected. DUH!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K