Topology: Munkres - Urysohn lemma

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fisicks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Munkres Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Urysohn lemma as presented in Munkres' topology text, specifically addressing the existence of a continuous function f: X -> [0,1] that meets certain conditions related to closed G(delta) sets. The user seeks clarification on the continuity aspect of the function defined as fx = sup{f_n(x)}. The conversation highlights the need for a reference regarding the behavior of f outside the sets A and B, as well as an explanation of the term "G(delta)" in the context of normal spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normal spaces in topology
  • Familiarity with the Urysohn lemma
  • Knowledge of G(delta) sets
  • Basic concepts of continuity in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the proof of the Urysohn lemma in Munkres' "Topology" (2nd edition)
  • Study the properties of G(delta) sets in normal spaces
  • Explore continuity definitions and theorems in topology
  • Investigate examples of continuous functions defined on closed sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology, researchers interested in functional analysis, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to the Urysohn lemma and G(delta) sets.

Fisicks
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Hi, the problem I am referencing is section 33 problem 4.

Let X be normal. There exists a continuous function f: X -> [0,1] such that fx=0 for x in A and fx >0 for x not in A, if and only if A is a closed G(delta) set in X.

My question is about the <= direction.

So let B be the collection of open sets whose intersection is A and index them with the natural numbers. Let U_n be an element of B. For each U_n, define a function f_n. To define f_n follow the proof of Urysohn lemma using A=A, B=X-U_n.

Define fx= sup{f_n(x)} for all n.

Clearly fx=0 iff x is in A. My problem is with showing continuity. Part of me thinks that if x is an element of X and (a,b) is a basic open set of fx, then there exists an open set U such fU is contained in (a,b) since each f_n is continuous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we need a reference here as Urysohn doesn't make a statement about the values of ##f## outside ##A## and ##B##. Also "G(delta)" needs to be explained.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K