Hi, the problem im referencing is section 33 problem 4.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let X be normal. There exists a continuous function f: X -> [0,1] such that fx=0 for x in A and fx >0 for x not in A, if and only if A is a closed G(delta) set in X.

My question is about the <= direction.

So let B be the collection of open sets whose intersection is A and index them with the natural numbers. Let U_n be an element of B. For each U_n, define a function f_n. To define f_n follow the proof of Urysohn lemma using A=A, B=X-U_n.

Define fx= sup{f_n(x)} for all n.

Clearly fx=0 iff x is in A. My problem is with showing continuity. Part of me thinks that if x is an element of X and (a,b) is a basic open set of fx, then there exists an open set U such fU is contained in (a,b) since each f_n is continuous.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Topology munkres - urysohn lemma

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Topology munkres urysohn | Date |
---|---|

I What chapters of Munkres Topology are essential? | Dec 19, 2016 |

Knots and Munkres | Dec 14, 2015 |

Munkres Topology - Chapter 7 - Complete Metric Spaces and Function Spaces | Jan 15, 2013 |

Explanation of uniform topology theorem in Munkres | Nov 2, 2012 |

Topology Munkres answer | Jul 27, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**