Total mass in the universe = infinite (Dirac Sea calculation)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The total mass of the universe is calculated to be infinite based on the concept of the Dirac sea, which posits that an infinite number of negative energy states must be filled by electrons. Dirac's theory suggests that these negative energy states allow for the existence of positrons, particles with opposite charge to electrons, resulting from unoccupied positions in the negative energy levels. However, the discussion concludes that the Dirac sea postulate is outdated, as modern physics recognizes that negative energy solutions correspond to positive energy solutions of antiparticles, negating the need for the Dirac sea concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and particle physics
  • Familiarity with the Dirac equation and its implications
  • Knowledge of particle-antiparticle interactions
  • Basic concepts of energy states in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Dirac equation in modern physics
  • Research the concept of antiparticles and their role in quantum field theory
  • Explore alternative theories to the Dirac sea, such as quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Investigate condensed matter physics examples related to negative energy states
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational theories of particle physics and their evolution over time.

LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
I calculate that the total mass in the universe is infinite.

If there is an infinite number of negative energy states an electron can occupy and all the states must be filled with the lowest energy state being an infinite sea of electrons, then the total mass of the universe must be infinite.

Based on this text:

...This had the uncomfortable consequence that an electron could radiate energy indefinitely, as it dropped into ever lower negative energy states. To avoid this problem,
Dirac postulated that every negative energy state was filled; the lowest energy state in
nature being an infinite collection of negative energy electrons known as the "Dirac
sea." theory also allowed for the possibility than a negative energy electron could
absorb a photon and jump to a positive energy level, leaving an unoccupied position
in the negative energy levels. It turned out that this unoccupied position would
behave in every way as though it were itself a particle with the electron mass and
spin, but with the opposite charge: a "positron." These particles were discovered by
Anderson, in cosmic ray studies, just a few years after their existence was predicted
by Dirac.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The postulate is outdated and should quickly be forgotten. Dirac attributed the negative energy solutions of the Dirac equation to excited electrons that leave "holes" in the Dirac sea. But we now know that these negative energy solutions are in fact positive energy solutions carried by the antiparticles of the electrons. There is no Dirac sea (although there are some nice condensed matter examples, but these are not fundamental).
 
xepma said:
The postulate is outdated and should quickly be forgotten. Dirac attributed the negative energy solutions of the Dirac equation to excited electrons that leave "holes" in the Dirac sea. But we now know that these negative energy solutions are in fact positive energy solutions carried by the antiparticles of the electrons. There is no Dirac sea (although there are some nice condensed matter examples, but these are not fundamental).

But the anti-particles were just unoccupied spaces within the filled negative energy levels that Dirac postulated would act exactly like a particle with opposite charge. The fact that there is proof of anti-particles supports the theory, it does not replace it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
542