Transformations always give me trouble, but this one does in particular.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Assume [itex]X_1[/itex], [itex]X_2[/itex] independent with binomial distributions of parameters [itex]n_1[/itex], [itex]n_2[/itex], and [itex]p=1/2[/itex] for each.

Show [itex]Y = X_1 - X_2 + n_2[/itex] has a binomial distribution with parameters [itex]n= n_1 + n_2[/itex], [itex]p = 1/2[/itex].

My first instinct was to pick a variable [itex]Z = X_2[/itex], define a joint distribution of [itex]Y[/itex] and [itex]Z[/itex], and sum over all values of [itex]Z[/itex]. I ran into some complex algebra when summing this joint distribution over all values of [itex]Z[/itex], [itex]0[/itex] to [itex]n_2[/itex]. If anyone knows how to sum over all values of z for (n_1 choose y+z-n_2)*(n_2 chooze z) so as to get (n_1 + n_2 choose y), I would love to hear how, but I'm pretty sure this is a no-go.

My next thought was to still choose [itex]Z = X_2[/itex], but this time get the mgf of Y and Z. This boils down to [itex](1/2 + exp(t_1)/2)^{n_1}(1/2 + exp(t_2)/2)^{n_2}[/itex]. When I set [itex]t = t_1 + t_2[/itex], I get an mgf which fits what we're looking for, i.e. the binomial distribution with parameters [itex]n_1[/itex], [itex]n_2[/itex], and [itex]p=1/2[/itex]. But I don't know if that is valid algebra, as a means of obtaining an mgf for a univariate distribution from an mgf for a bivariate distribution.

Any thoughts welcome!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Transformation of pmf; bivariate to single-variate

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**