Translating Motion - Which is the most efficient?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chantry09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
Chantry09
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I need some wisdom! Here is my problem. I want to make an air powered engine. This isn't a problem, I have plans for this. However, I want to put my own twist on the engine. I want it to be a axial engine, so the axle is in the same plane as the cylinders.

The importance factor is efficiency, I want this mechanism to convert the energy as efficiently as possible, translating to low start-up torque and high RPM output.

There seems to be a few ways to do this, so if I put down some of my options, can you advise me on the best route.

Option 1. Swatch Plate

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/swash%20plate%20motor3.gif

Option 2. Trebert

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/Trebert%20stationary%20cylinders%20anim.gif

Option 3. Wobble Plate

[PLAIN]http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/museum/POWER/unusualICeng/axial-ICeng/wobble%20plate%20motor1.gif

Option 4. Barrel Cam

LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvtekHPzbUw

Option 5. Radial Engine (I know, the cylinders arnt in the same plane as axle)

[URL]http://www.motorera.com/dictionary/pics/r/radial_engine.jpg[/URL]

Option 6. None of the above!

Id be really interested to hear what your thoughts are on this, and input would be hugely appreciated.

James
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
how many rpm do you want to get?
 
Pretty interesting and clever design ideas you've found.
 
Hi! Thank you, it took me a while to find them. I am looking to get around 2000-3000rpm