Translating (Transforming) a recursive function

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around transforming a recursive function to compute values in a sequence while adjusting for array indexing. The user is trying to rewrite the equation and initial conditions to accommodate negative indices, shifting the function definitions accordingly. They express confusion about how the shifts in the function and initial values relate mathematically, particularly when transitioning from k to k'. A suggestion is made to let the program handle the shifts automatically, which may involve modifying the equation to account for the new indexing. The user is implementing this in MATLAB and seeks clarification on the formal approach to achieve the desired results.
fred4321
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having trouble understanding how this works.

I am giving the following:
y[k+2] - y[k+1] + 0.24y[k] = f[k+2] - 2f[k+1];

y[-2] = 1, y[-1] = 2;

f[k] = 0 for k < 0;
f[k] = k for k >= 0;

I would like to have a program compute the next values in the sequence, so, I need y[-2] = 1 to become y[1] = 1 and y[-1] = 2 to become y[2] = 1 (so that the array indexing works, e.g., I can access a negative location of an array).

I let k' = k + 1 so that I'd get:
y[k'+3] - y[k'+2] + 0.24y[k'+1] = f[k'+3] - 2f[k'+1];
Then I made:
f[k] = 0 for k < 0;
f[k] = k for k >= 0;
become
f[k'] = 0 for k' < 3;
f[k'] = k for k' >= 3;
and
y[-2] = 1, y[-1] = 2;
become
y[1] = 1, y[2] = 2;

So now I have:
y[k'+3] - y[k'+2] + 0.24y[k'+1] = f[k'+3] - 2f[k'+1];
f[k'] = 0 for k' < 3;
f[k'] = k for k' >= 3;
y[1] = 1, y[2] = 2;

And now when I let k = 0, k[3] gives me the value that k[0] gave me in the old equation, which is exactly what I want.

My issue is, I don't understand how, mathematically, this works. For example, I don't understand how I went from:
f[k] = 0 for k < 0;
f[k] = k for k >= 0;
to
f[k'] = 0 for k' < 3;
f[k'] = k for k' >= 3;

if k' = k + 1.

It seems as though I've shifted the equation (y[k+2] - y[k+1] + 0.24y[k] = f[k+2] - 2f[k+1];) over by 1 unit in the positive x direction; however, I've shifted the initial values (y[-2] = 1, y[-1] = 2;) and the f's restrictions (k < 0; and k >= 0) over by 3 units.What I'm thinking is:
The original question should be:
f[k'] = 0 for k < k[0];
f[k'] = k for k' >= k[0];
y[k[0]-2] = 1, y[k[0]-1] = 2;

What would be the correct, more formal approach to achieving what I want. Also, should the original question be as I've written above?

I'm pretty sure that the equation, as it's give, only produces the 'correct' answer, when k[0] = -2.

Thank you for your time, I realize that this question is rather lengthy.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You simply shouldn't worry about "f(k) for k< -3" at all. Include, in your program,
"Double f(Double x)
{
Double y= 0;
if (x>= 0) y= x;
return y;
}
and let the program handle shifts.
 
Thanks for the reply. What do you mean by, "let the program handle the shift"?

Do you mean by changing adding k+n to the original equation so that it works out?

Also, I know that I didn't say, but I'm actually doing this with MATLAB, I don't think that makes a difference. On know C++ though so I understand your code.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
751
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K