Translation Invariant: Seeing it Intuitively & Mathematically

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Translation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of translation invariance in Hamiltonians, particularly in the context of quantum mechanics. Participants explore both intuitive and mathematical perspectives on how translation invariance affects the diagonalization of Hamiltonians in the momentum basis, with specific reference to the hydrogen atom and central potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand the mathematical implications of a translation invariant Hamiltonian being diagonal in the momentum basis.
  • Another participant suggests that demonstrating the commutation relation ##[\hat p, \hat H] = 0## would show that the momentum operator and Hamiltonian can be simultaneously diagonalized.
  • A different viewpoint is presented, arguing that the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian, while translationally invariant, is not diagonal in the momentum basis due to the potential energy term's dependence on the relative position of particles.
  • Another participant notes that the 'true' hydrogen atom Hamiltonian should be diagonal in the momentum basis, but approximations made in typical discussions lead to a translationally variant Hamiltonian.
  • One participant provides a specific Hamiltonian example and argues that it is not diagonal in the momentum basis, as only the sum of the momentum operators commutes with the Hamiltonian.
  • A suggestion is made to rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of center of mass and relative motion variables, indicating that this approach could lead to a complete set of observables.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is diagonal in the momentum basis under translational invariance, indicating a lack of consensus on this point. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions of translational invariance and the assumptions made about the Hamiltonians discussed, particularly concerning the treatment of the nucleus in the hydrogen atom model.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
How do I see that when my hamiltonian is translation invariant i.e. H = H(r-r') it means that it is diagonal in the momentum basis? I can see it intuitively but not mathematically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can show that ##[\hat p, \hat H] = 0## then you have shown that ##\hat p## and ##\hat H## can be simultaneously diagonalized, which is what you are after.
 
With your definition of translational invariance (if I understood it, it is invariance with respect to coordinate shifts) the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is translationally invariant, because the potential energy term is function of ##|\mathbf r_1 - \mathbf r_2|##. But this Hamiltonian is not diagonal in the momentum basis.
 
the 'true' hydrogen atom Hamiltonian should be diagonal in the momentum basis. But usually people just talk about a central potential, and ignore the nucleus, since it is much heavier than the electron. Once we make this approximation of a central potential and ignore the nucleus, the potential energy term now depends on absolute spatial position, so the Hamiltonian is translationally variant.
 
Even if the Hamiltonian
$$
\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{\mathbf{p}}_1^2}{2m_1} + \frac{\hat{\mathbf{p}}_2^2}{2m_2} - \frac{Kq^2}{4\pi} \frac{1}{|\mathbf r_1 - \mathbf r_2|},
$$
is translationally invariant, I do not think it is diagonal in the momentum basis ##\mathbf p_1, \mathbf p_2##. Only the sum of the two momentum operators commutes with the Hamiltonian, but the momentum operators individally do not.
 
Rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of the CM motion and the relative motion, i.e., in terms of the new variables
\vec{R}=\frac{m_1 \vec{r}_1 + m_2 \vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}, \quad \vec{P}=\vec{p_1}+\vec{p}_2, \quad \vec{r}=\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2, \quad \vec{p}=\frac{m_2 \vec{p}_1-m_1 \vec{p}_2}{m_1+m_2}.
Then you can show that \vec{P}, \vec{H}, \vec{l}^2 and l_z with the orbital angular momentum of the relative motion
\vec{l}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}
form a complete set of observables.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K