Translation Invariant: Seeing it Intuitively & Mathematically

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Translation
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
How do I see that when my hamiltonian is translation invariant i.e. H = H(r-r') it means that it is diagonal in the momentum basis? I can see it intuitively but not mathematically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can show that ##[\hat p, \hat H] = 0## then you have shown that ##\hat p## and ##\hat H## can be simultaneously diagonalized, which is what you are after.
 
With your definition of translational invariance (if I understood it, it is invariance with respect to coordinate shifts) the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is translationally invariant, because the potential energy term is function of ##|\mathbf r_1 - \mathbf r_2|##. But this Hamiltonian is not diagonal in the momentum basis.
 
the 'true' hydrogen atom Hamiltonian should be diagonal in the momentum basis. But usually people just talk about a central potential, and ignore the nucleus, since it is much heavier than the electron. Once we make this approximation of a central potential and ignore the nucleus, the potential energy term now depends on absolute spatial position, so the Hamiltonian is translationally variant.
 
Even if the Hamiltonian
$$
\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{\mathbf{p}}_1^2}{2m_1} + \frac{\hat{\mathbf{p}}_2^2}{2m_2} - \frac{Kq^2}{4\pi} \frac{1}{|\mathbf r_1 - \mathbf r_2|},
$$
is translationally invariant, I do not think it is diagonal in the momentum basis ##\mathbf p_1, \mathbf p_2##. Only the sum of the two momentum operators commutes with the Hamiltonian, but the momentum operators individally do not.
 
Rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of the CM motion and the relative motion, i.e., in terms of the new variables
[tex]\vec{R}=\frac{m_1 \vec{r}_1 + m_2 \vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}, \quad \vec{P}=\vec{p_1}+\vec{p}_2, \quad \vec{r}=\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2, \quad \vec{p}=\frac{m_2 \vec{p}_1-m_1 \vec{p}_2}{m_1+m_2}.[/tex]
Then you can show that [itex]\vec{P}[/itex], [itex]\vec{H}[/itex], [itex]\vec{l}^2[/itex] and [itex]l_z[/itex] with the orbital angular momentum of the relative motion
[tex]\vec{l}=\vec{r}\times \vec{p}[/tex]
form a complete set of observables.