MHB Triangle and logarithm problem

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:
Given that $a,b$ and $c$ are the sides of $\Delta ABC$ such that $$z=\log_{2^a+2^{-a}} \left(4(ab+bc+ca)-(a+b+c)^2\right)$$ then $z$ has a real value if and only if

A)a=b=2c
B)3a=2b=c
C)a-b=3c
D)None of these

Attempt:
I am not sure where to start with this kind of problem. I wrote the expression inside the logarithm as follows:
$$-(a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca))$$
Since, anything inside the logarithm must be greater than zero, I have
$$a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca)<0 \Rightarrow a^2+b^2+c^2<2(ab+bc+ca)$$
But $a^2+b^2+c^2 >ab+bc+ca$, I get $ab+bc+ca>0$. I doubt this is going to help.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pranav said:
Problem:
Given that $a,b$ and $c$ are the sides of $\Delta ABC$ such that $$z=\log_{2^a+2^{-a}} \left(4(ab+bc+ca)-(a+b+c)^2\right)$$ then $z$ has a real value if and only if

A)a=b=2c
B)3a=2b=c
C)a-b=3c
D)None of these

Attempt:
I am not sure where to start with this kind of problem. I wrote the expression inside the logarithm as follows:
$$-(a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca))$$
Since, anything inside the logarithm must be greater than zero,

Hey Pranav! :)

I agree that the argument to the logarithm should be greater than zero.
From that point on the problem is symmetric in $a,b,c$.
That is, they can be swapped around giving the same expression.
In other words, none of the answers A, B, or C fit.
Therefore the answer must be D.

I have
$$a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca)<0 \Rightarrow a^2+b^2+c^2<2(ab+bc+ca)$$
But $a^2+b^2+c^2 >ab+bc+ca$, I get $ab+bc+ca>0$. I doubt this is going to help.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

I believe that should be a $\ge$ sign.

Anyway, since $a,b,c$ are the sides of a triangle (which you did not use yet), you can conclude that this is always the case.
 
If $a,b,c$ are the sides of a triangle then $b+c > a$, $c+a>b$ and $a+b>c$. Multiply the first of those inequalities by $a$, the second by $b$ and the third by $c$, and add. That gives $2(bc+ca+ab) > a^2+b^2+c^2.$ Therefore $4(bc+ca+ab) > a^2+b^2+c^2 + 2(bc+ca+ab) = (a+b+c)^2.$ So $4(bc+ca+ab) - (a+b+c)^2$ is always positive and therefore always has a real logarithm (to any base).
 
I like Serena said:
That is, they can be swapped around giving the same expression.

Hi ILS! :)

I understand the above statement but how do you conclude the following:
In other words, none of the answers A, B, or C fit.
:confused:

Opalg said:
If $a,b,c$ are the sides of a triangle then $b+c > a$, $c+a>b$ and $a+b>c$. Multiply the first of those inequalities by $a$, the second by $b$ and the third by $c$, and add. That gives $2(bc+ca+ab) > a^2+b^2+c^2.$ Therefore $4(bc+ca+ab) > a^2+b^2+c^2 + 2(bc+ca+ab) = (a+b+c)^2.$ So $4(bc+ca+ab) - (a+b+c)^2$ is always positive and therefore always has a real logarithm (to any base).

Thanks a lot Opalg, very nicely done. :)
 
Pranav said:
Hi ILS! :)

I understand the above statement but how do you conclude the following:
In other words, none of the answers A, B, or C fit.

Since the problem is symmetric in $a, b, c$ the correct answer will also have to be symmetric in $a, b, c$. Neither of the answers A, B, or C are.
 
I like Serena said:
Since the problem is symmetric in $a, b, c$ the correct answer will also have to be symmetric in $a, b, c$. Neither of the answers A, B, or C are.

I see it now, thanks ILS! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top