MHB Trouble understanding PMF tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Longines
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around understanding probability mass function (PMF) tables and their application in a textbook question involving a random variable X that follows a binomial distribution. The initial query highlights confusion regarding the use of Bayes' theorem in solving the problem. Participants suggest focusing on the PMF of the binomial distribution for the first part of the question. For the second part, the law of total probability is recommended as a guiding principle. Clarification on these concepts is essential for solving the posed questions effectively.
Longines
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I'm back with another basic probability question:

View attachment 3283

I know that it involves Bayes theorem somewhere, but I don't understand this question at all!

Note: This isn't an assignment question or anything like that, it's just a textbook question that I need help with.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • JDvJmAJ.png
    JDvJmAJ.png
    20.9 KB · Views: 106
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Let's kick-off with question $(a)$. We have given that $X$ is a random variable such that conditionally on $\{U=u\}$, $X$ is binomial with parameters $(2,u)$.

Do you know the binomial distribution? If you do, you only need to apply it's PMF for question $(a)$.

Hint for question $(b)$: law of total probability.
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.

Similar threads