I'm having trouble understanding an example supposed to motivate Bayes' theorem.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Assume that 40% of all interstate highway accidents involve excessive speed on part of at least one of the drivers (event E) and that 30% involve alcohol use by at least one drives (event A). If alcohol is involved there is a 60% chance that excessive speed is also involred; otherwise, this probability is only 10%. An accident involves speeding. What is the probability that alcohol is involved? We are given these probabilities:

##P[E] = 0.4 \; \; P[A]=0.3 \; \; P[E|A] = 0.6##

##P[E'] = 0.6 \; \; P[A'] = 0.7 \; \; P[E|A'] = 0.1##

We are being asked to find ##P[A|E]##. From the definition of conditional probability

##P[A|E]=\frac{P[E\cap A]}{P[E]}## (1)

We have by the multiplication rule that ##P[E\cap A] = P[E|A]P[A]## and that

##E = (E\cap A) \cup (E \cap A')## and hence

##P[E] = P[E\cap A]+ P[E\cap A']##.

substituting this into the equation we have

##P[A|E] = \frac{P[E|A]P[A]}{P[E|A]P[A]+P[E|A']P[A']}##.

My question is pretty much why the ##P[E]## in (1) isn't the same as the one given earlier? I.E. why do I have to split up ##E## into two parts (or use Bayes' theorem instead of the definition for conditional probability directly.)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Understanding conditional probability and Bayes' theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Understanding conditional probability | Date |
---|---|

B Understanding Chi Squared p-values | Jan 23, 2018 |

I Correct way to understand logical implication? | Feb 23, 2017 |

I Understanding Yates' correction | Feb 9, 2017 |

Help understanding Suppes' formal conditional definition | Feb 5, 2014 |

Understanding a boundary condition on the density of probability | Jul 31, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**