A Try to swap between mean and partial derivatives on a product

fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
I would like to be able to prove that we can swap the mean and partial derivatives on the defintion of a Fisher element matrix : this defintion involves the mean of a product of derivatives on Likelihood. I have also tried to formulate it with the ##chi^2## and the matrix of covariance of observables (noted "Cov" below). All of this is done in the goal that observable big "O" that I introduce is independent and so I have just to sum the extra elements calculated from "O".
ql_f8f0c320525364af7e51bf75d73df623_l3.png
part2.png
 

Attachments

  • ql_f8f0c320525364af7e51bf75d73df623_l3.png
    ql_f8f0c320525364af7e51bf75d73df623_l3.png
    23.2 KB · Views: 128
  • ql_f01012f65d1ee6f94ea9a18dc9c30cc2_l3.png
    ql_f01012f65d1ee6f94ea9a18dc9c30cc2_l3.png
    27.4 KB · Views: 128
  • part2.png
    part2.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 124
Physics news on Phys.org
The operations are swappable if they're linear operations. Can you show that the operations are linear?
 
That said, I don't think this is a valid equation, as you seem to require, if my quick skimming of your post is correct:
$$\langle {\partial \chi^2 \over \partial \lambda_i \lambda_j} \rangle = \langle {\partial \chi^2 \over \partial \lambda_i} \rangle\langle {\partial \chi^2 \over \partial \lambda_j} \rangle$$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top