hover
- 342
- 0
Hello,
It's only been recently that I have acquired the math skills to deal with the time independent version of Schrödinger's Equation which is:
\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi(x) + U(x)\Psi(x) = E\Psi(x)
I tried to derive a wavefunction that deals with a particle in a confined box with infinite walls as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/pbox.html#c1"
I was able to get something similar to:
\Psi(x) = A*sin(kx)
What somewhat baffles me is how they define lambda( the wavelength within k as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html#c2"). Perhaps I am missing the obvious but why would the biggest wavelength be
\lambda = 2L
Why not have
\lambda = 4L
Or
\lambda = 7L
What makes \lambda = 2L the biggest wavelength value. This would clear up a ton.
The second and last question I have(so far) is what particular value of n does a particle need to take? What does the value of n depend upon?
Thanks!
It's only been recently that I have acquired the math skills to deal with the time independent version of Schrödinger's Equation which is:
\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi(x) + U(x)\Psi(x) = E\Psi(x)
I tried to derive a wavefunction that deals with a particle in a confined box with infinite walls as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/pbox.html#c1"
I was able to get something similar to:
\Psi(x) = A*sin(kx)
What somewhat baffles me is how they define lambda( the wavelength within k as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html#c2"). Perhaps I am missing the obvious but why would the biggest wavelength be
\lambda = 2L
Why not have
\lambda = 4L
Or
\lambda = 7L
What makes \lambda = 2L the biggest wavelength value. This would clear up a ton.
The second and last question I have(so far) is what particular value of n does a particle need to take? What does the value of n depend upon?
Thanks!
Last edited by a moderator: