Trying to understand Schrodinger's Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schrodinger's equation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Schrödinger's Equation, specifically its time-independent form, in the context of a particle confined in an infinite potential well. Participants explore the derivation of wavefunctions, the significance of wavelength, and the determination of quantum numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant derives the wavefunction for a particle in a box, arriving at a form of ψ(x) = A*sin(kx) and questions why the largest wavelength is λ = 2L instead of other possible values like λ = 4L or λ = 7L.
  • Another participant provides a proof showing that the wave function must be zero outside the box and continuous within, leading to the conclusion that the longest wavelength that satisfies these conditions is λ = 2L.
  • A third participant appreciates the mathematical derivation and the conceptual explanation provided by others regarding the conditions for the wave function.
  • Questions arise about how to determine the quantum number n, with some suggesting it relates to energy levels and whether n always takes the lowest possible value.
  • Participants discuss the nature of the energy E_n, with one asserting that it represents total energy, which is kinetic in this specific case of the infinite potential well.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the discrete nature of n and its role in defining different energy states and corresponding wavefunctions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical derivation leading to λ = 2L and the conditions for the wave function. However, there is ongoing discussion about the determination of the quantum number n and its implications, indicating that multiple views remain on this aspect.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the dependence of n on energy levels and whether it can take values beyond the lowest state. The discussion also touches on the relationship between total energy and kinetic energy without resolving the nuances of these concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in wavefunctions, quantum states, and the implications of Schrödinger's Equation in confined systems.

hover
Messages
342
Reaction score
0
Hello,

It's only been recently that I have acquired the math skills to deal with the time independent version of Schrödinger's Equation which is:

[tex]\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi(x) + U(x)\Psi(x) = E\Psi(x)[/tex]

I tried to derive a wavefunction that deals with a particle in a confined box with infinite walls as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/pbox.html#c1"

I was able to get something similar to:

[tex]\Psi(x) = A*sin(kx)[/tex]

What somewhat baffles me is how they define lambda( the wavelength within k as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html#c2"). Perhaps I am missing the obvious but why would the biggest wavelength be
[tex]\lambda = 2L[/tex]
Why not have
[tex]\lambda = 4L[/tex]
Or
[tex]\lambda = 7L[/tex]
What makes [tex]\lambda = 2L[/tex] the biggest wavelength value. This would clear up a ton.
The second and last question I have(so far) is what particular value of n does a particle need to take? What does the value of n depend upon?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hover said:
[itex]\frac{-\hbar^2}{2\m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2}\Psi(x) + U(x)\Psi(x) = E\Psi(x)[/itex]
fx'd

In case you want to know, I'll show you a full proof of this.

First, let's define a function for this infinite potential well

U(x)={∞; x<0 or x>L}={0; 0≤x≤L}

So the Schrödinger's equation for 0≤x≤L become:
(-ħ2/2m)ψ''=Eψ

We have
ψ'' + (2mE/ħ2)ψ = 0

The solution of an equation is
ψ=Acos(kx) + Bsin(kx)
where k=sqrt(2mE/ħ2) and A,B are constant.

from the condition: ψ(0)=0;
ψ(0) = Acos(0) + Bsin(0) = A = 0

Thus the equation become;
ψ=Bsin(kx)

also; ψ(L)=0;
ψ(L) = Bsin(kL) = 0
But for B≠0;
kL=n¶ or
L=n¶/k

but for k=2¶/λ

so
L = nλ/2

for the minimum state n; n=1
λ = 2L #

and that's the reason for this particular number.
guess it's clear :)
 
Last edited:
hover said:
What somewhat baffles me is how they define lambda( the wavelength within k as shown http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html#c2"). Perhaps I am missing the obvious but why would the biggest wavelength be
[tex]\lambda = 2L[/tex]

It follows from these requirements:

1. The wave function must be zero outside the box, because of the "infinitely-high" walls.

2. The wave function must be continuous with no abrupt "jumps" from one point to the next.

This means that the equation you use for the wave function inside the box must evaluate to zero at the walls. What's the longest wavelength that gives you a node (zero point) at both walls?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the responses! I like both solutions that are proposed here. On one hand, Black Integra shows how the math just makes the λ=2L fall right out. On the other hand, jtbell shows how the λ=2L falls right out by stating 2 requirements. The longest wavelength must be λ=2L since the wave gives you a zero point starting at a the beginning of wavelength and if you add a half the wavelength you end up at zero again. Very nice solutions.

Just one more question. How does one determine what value of n the wave is in? Since n relates to the amount of energy, does n always take the lowest possible value?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/schr.html#c3"

[tex]E_n = \frac{n^2h^2}{8mL^2}[/tex]

Also is En a kinetic energy or potential energy? I assume it is a kinetic energy since that is how it seems to be described in the link.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No problems, hover :)

If you still prefer equations for an explanation, here we go.

What is the value of En?
From the relation I've said
L=n¶/k ----> k=n¶/L
and
(kħ)2=2mE

So we have a Total Energy at state n

En=(1/2m)(n¶ħ/L)2=(1/8m)(nh/L)2
It's total energy, due to the variable E in Schrödinger's equation.
Anyway, the potential of system is zero at 0≤x≤L.
So, in this case, total energy is equal to kinatic energy.

What exactly is the value n?
n is considered to be a state number of each system.

For example, the value of n in the energy level of hydrogen atom.
In this system, i.e. infinite square well, there're many states depending on the value n(or total energy).
Each energy will give different wave function(different n).
At n=1, it will give the lowest energy. This energy is called 'zero-point energy'

The value n is a discrete value. So it could not be any value. It just like a resonance of LRC-circuit or spectrum of Hg-atom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K