Two DOF Anglepoise Spring-balance with Distributed weight

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on designing a two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) robot arm inspired by the Anglepoise lamp, utilizing a spring-balance mechanism to maintain static balance across all positions. The design aims to reduce motor torque requirements by allowing springs to support the payload weight, thus lowering costs. The referenced article by M.J. French and M.B. Widden provides formulas for calculating spring constants, specifically for scenarios where the arm's mass is negligible. The user seeks assistance in calculating spring constants for a two DOF structure that incorporates the mass of the arm while ensuring balance at various angles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mechanisms
  • Familiarity with spring constant calculations (k = mgr/bc)
  • Knowledge of static balance principles in mechanical systems
  • Experience with mechanical design and modeling software
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating spring constants in multi-link mechanisms
  • Explore the principles of static equilibrium in robotic arms
  • Learn about the dynamics of parallelogram linkages in mechanical design
  • Investigate simulation tools for modeling robotic arm behavior under varying loads
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, robotics designers, and hobbyists interested in building balanced robotic arms or similar mechanisms using spring-balance systems.

kavaro
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am designing a a robot arm based on the two degree of freedom anglepoise lamp, like the typical desk lamp or Pixar lamp, that consists of two parallelograms, each balanced with a spring. The goal is to design it so that it remains statically balanced at all positions and let two springs carry all the weight of the payload. This will drastically reduce the torque requirements of the motors and therefore make it cheaper. The additional benefit is that, because of the parallelograms, the payload does not tilt as the structure is moved.

I'm working from this article:
http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/20295/1/20295.pdf
The spring-and-lever balancing mechanism, George Carwardine and the Anglepoise Lamp
M J French and M B Widden
Engineering Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Lancaster University, UK

The article very clearly describes how to calculate the required spring constants (for the required zero free length springs) for models in which the mass of the structure of the arm is negligible (k = mgr/bc).

For including the mass, the article only explains the process for the 'more elegant' two DOF model in which all the springs are at the base of the structure.

I am now trying to calculate the spring constants for the two DOF structure with the parallelograms by incorporating the mass of the structure itself. If you look at the attached pictures, you can see that the problem is easy if P1 and P2 are in a vertical line, because the center of mass of each link of the structure can be measured from the the same reference.

My problem is that I can't seem to find a solution that incorporates the mass of the structure and is balanced for all angles when P1 and P2 is not in a vertical line.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 9.38.54 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 9.38.54 AM.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 955
  • Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 9.37.44 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-05-27 at 9.37.44 AM.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 1,079
Engineering news on Phys.org
Only if you use the linkage shown in Fig.4. of your reference, is there a simple solution involving the mass of the links.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
32K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K